Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59901
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinnett, Alexen
dc.contributor.authorDunshea, Franken
dc.contributor.authorD'Souza, Darrylen
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm, Billen
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Garryen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-24T06:11:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-24T06:11:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationAFBM Journal, v.19, p. 79-93en
dc.identifier.issn1449-7875en
dc.identifier.issn1449-5937en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59901-
dc.description.abstract<p>Consumers of fresh pork have long been aware of the risk of their pork purchases not meeting eating expectations due to unpleasant taste or smell or other unsatisfactory quality characteristics such as a lack of tenderness. Boar taint, or the risk of it, is one of the most important factors identified in surveys of consumers of pork as being responsible for having a poor eating experience. Immuno-castration (IC) of entire male pigs is one method of reducing boar taint in pork. Currently about 60 per cent of male pork produced in Australia is immune-castrated. The question asked here is whether it would be profitable for the industry if the remaining male slaughter pigs were immuno-castrated as well. The additional costs associated with IC include the costs of the vaccine, extra labour costs, and additional costs arising from abscesses at the injection site causing increased product downgrades and stoppages of the slaughter line for cleaning. A major benefit of IC for the pig industry is a reduction in consumers of pork enduring poor experiences from unpleasant taste or smell when they eat pork. Over time, reducing the occurrence, and the risk of occurrence, of having a less than satisfactory experience when consuming pork has the potential benefit of the industry avoiding losing customers, and even increasing demand for pork, above what it would be with the continuation of the current proportion of boar-tainted pork in the total national supply of pork. Over the next ten years, if national consumption of pork increases at the same trend of the past decade, the benefits from avoided annual losses of demand or from increases in demand by just 0.5 per cent of total annual national consumption of pork would cover the cost of the remainder of the industry adopting IC. This conclusion applies if IC was adopted fully and immediately and the cost was the lower of the range of possible cost estimates at $0.10/kg carcass weight. More realistically, if producers adopted IC more slowly and adoption of IC took five years, and the cost of using IC was $0.10/kg carcass weight, then avoiding or preventing a loss of 1.5 per cent in annual sales would mean the total benefits exceed the total costs of achieving this outcome. Such relatively small gains in sales or avoided losses of sales seem eminently achievable. The conclusion of the BCA is that an increased use of immuno-castration in Australia’s pig production system that reduces the prevalence and the risk of boar taint would have a high likelihood of delivering a net benefit to participants in the industry.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCharles Sturt University, AFBM Networken
dc.relation.ispartofAFBM Journalen
dc.titleA Benefit Cost Analysis of Entire Male Pig Immunocastrationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.22004/ag.econ.333930en
local.contributor.firstnameAlexen
local.contributor.firstnameFranken
local.contributor.firstnameDarrylen
local.contributor.firstnameBillen
local.contributor.firstnameGarryen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailggriffit@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.identifier.runningnumber4en
local.format.startpage79en
local.format.endpage93en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume19en
local.contributor.lastnameSinnetten
local.contributor.lastnameDunsheaen
local.contributor.lastnameD'Souzaen
local.contributor.lastnameMalcolmen
local.contributor.lastnameGriffithen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ggriffiten
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5276-6222en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/59901en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA Benefit Cost Analysis of Entire Male Pig Immunocastrationen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333930en
local.search.authorSinnett, Alexen
local.search.authorDunshea, Franken
local.search.authorD'Souza, Darrylen
local.search.authorMalcolm, Billen
local.search.authorGriffith, Garryen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/eca00cd3-6ffe-443d-b76a-6b46dfe2e257en
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/eca00cd3-6ffe-443d-b76a-6b46dfe2e257en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/eca00cd3-6ffe-443d-b76a-6b46dfe2e257en
local.subject.for20203801 Applied economicsen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-05-24en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.