Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59791
Title: PREDICT prioritisation study: establishing the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine physicians in Australia and New Zealand.
Contributor(s): Deane, Heather Carol (author); Wilson, Catherine L (author); Babl, Franz E (author); Dalziel, Stuart R (author); Cheek, John Alexander (author); Craig, Simon S (author); Oakley, Ed (author); Borland, Meredith (author); Cheng, Nicholas G (author); Zhang, Michael (author); Cotterell, Elizabeth  (author)orcid ; Schuster, Tibor (author); Krieser, David (author)
Publication Date: 2018
Early Online Version: 2017-08-30
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206727
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59791
Abstract: 

Background The Paediatric Research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT) performs multicentre research in Australia and New Zealand. Research priorities are difficult to determine, often relying on individual interests or prior work.

Objective To identify the research priorities of paediatric emergency medicine (PEM) specialists working in Australia and New Zealand.

Methods Online surveys were administered in a two-stage, modified Delphi study. Eligible participants were PEM specialists (consultants and senior advanced trainees in PEM from 14 PREDICT sites). Participants submitted up to 3 of their most important research questions (survey 1). Responses were collated and refined, then a shortlist of refined questions was returned to participants for prioritisation (survey 2). A further prioritisation exercise was carried out at a PREDICT meeting using the Hanlon Process of Prioritisation. This determined the priorities of active researchers in PEM including an emphasis on the feasibility of a research question.

Results One hundred and six of 254 (42%) eligible participants responded to survey 1 and 142/245 (58%) to survey 2. One hundred and sixty-eight (66%) took part in either or both surveys. Two hundred forty-six individual research questions were submitted in survey 1. Survey 2 established a prioritised list of 35 research questions. Priority topics from both the Delphi and Hanlon process included high flow oxygenation in intubation, fluid volume resuscitation in sepsis, imaging in cervical spine injury, intravenous therapy for asthma and vasopressor use in sepsis.

Conclusion This prioritisation process has established a list of research questions, which will inform multicentre PEM research in Australia and New Zealand. It has also emphasised the importance of the translation of new knowledge.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Emergency medicine journal, 35(1), p. 39-45
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1742-6723
1742-6731
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 4203 Health services and systems
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: TBD
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Jul 6, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.