Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59695
Title: | Contested rights, unequal citizens: how the Constitution presents paradoxes and hopes of equality for India's Muslim minority |
Contributor(s): | Ahmed, Imran (author) |
Publication Date: | 2024 |
DOI: | 10.1080/1323238X.2023.2291747 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59695 |
Abstract: | | This article examines why the Indian Constitution is central to Muslim politics and political resistance. It examines the tensions and challenges the Indian Constitution and the political rise of Hindu nationalism present to the Muslim struggle for equality in India. The article underscores how the Indian Constitution's paradoxical stance on governing religion places religious minorities, particularly Muslims, in a challenging position amid evolving state and political ideologies, resulting in underrepresentation, political focus on identity and marginalisation, and difficulties in addressing inequalities and discrimination. A case study of the protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 (Ind) is employed to illustrate how constitutional paradoxes shaped advocacy efforts using the Constitution. However, these endeavours ultimately proved unsuccessful, shedding light on the challenges that lie ahead for advocates of Muslim rights.
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | Australian Journal of Human Rights, 29(3), p. 511-524 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis Australasia |
Place of Publication: | Australia |
ISSN: | 2573-573X 1323-238X |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 4303 Historical studies |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
|
Files in This Item:
1 files
Show full item record
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.