Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDawson, Blake Men
dc.contributor.authorWallman, James Fen
dc.contributor.authorBarton, Philip Sen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-22T03:29:23Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-22T03:29:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-
dc.identifier.citationForensic Science, Medicine and Pathology, 18(3), p. 343-351en
dc.identifier.issn1556-2891en
dc.identifier.issn1547-769Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59668-
dc.description.abstract<p>Providing accurate and reliable measures of decomposition is paramount for forensic research where decomposition progress is used to estimate time of death. Mass loss is routinely used as a direct measure of biomass decomposition in ecological studies, yet few studies have analysed mass loss in a forensic context on human cadavers to determine its usefulness for modelling the decomposition process. Mass loss was examined in decomposing human and pig cadavers, and compared with other common decomposition metrics, such as total body score (<i>TBS</i>). One summer and one winter feld decomposition experiment was conducted using human and pig cadavers, as pigs are often used as proxies for human cadavers in forensic research. The two measures of decomposition revealed two contrasting patterns of decomposition on pigs and humans, particularly in winter where <i>TBS</i> stabilised at similar values, but mass loss difered greatly. Mass loss was found to be faster in pigs than humans during early decomposition. Pigs lost 75% of their mass in winter, while humans lost less than 50%" however, in summer, both lost around 80% of their mass. <i>TBS</i> displayed similar patterns in both experiments, with <i>TBS</i> increasing more rapidly in pigs compared with humans but both eventually reaching similar <i>TBS</i> values in late decomposition. Measuring mass loss can provide additional information about decomposition progress that is missed if using <i>TBS</i> only. Key diferences in decomposition progress between cadaver types were also observed, suggesting caution when extrapolating data from pigs to humans for forensic research and decomposition modelling.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofForensic Science, Medicine and Pathologyen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleHow does mass loss compare with total body score when assessing decomposition of human and pig cadavers?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12024-022-00481-6en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameBlake Men
local.contributor.firstnameJames Fen
local.contributor.firstnamePhilip Sen
local.relation.isfundedbyARCen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental & Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailbdawso22@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.numberLE150100015en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage343en
local.format.endpage351en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume18en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameDawsonen
local.contributor.lastnameWallmanen
local.contributor.lastnameBartonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bdawso22en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-3953-8719en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/59668en
local.date.onlineversion2022-05-11-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleHow does mass loss compare with total body score when assessing decomposition of human and pig cadavers?en
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis work was supported by a SMAH Small Project Grant (University of Wollongong).en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.grantdescriptionARC/LE150100015en
local.search.authorDawson, Blake Men
local.search.authorWallman, James Fen
local.search.authorBarton, Philip Sen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/cd0fa33a-d5f1-4b4e-bcb4-72547e0d987cen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/cd0fa33a-d5f1-4b4e-bcb4-72547e0d987cen
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/cd0fa33a-d5f1-4b4e-bcb4-72547e0d987cen
local.subject.for20203002 Agriculture, land and farm managementen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-05-22en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/HowdoesDawson2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version3.08 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Jan 25, 2025
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons