Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59340
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWindsor, P Aen
dc.contributor.authorNampanya, Sen
dc.contributor.authorOlmo, Len
dc.contributor.authorKhounsy, Sen
dc.contributor.authorPhengsavanh, Pen
dc.contributor.authorBush, R Den
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-16T05:56:39Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-16T05:56:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science, 61(5), p. 503-513en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5787en
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/59340-
dc.description.abstract<p><i><b>Context. </b></i>Large-ruminant production in developing countries is inefficient with low growth rates and declining weights, particularly in the dry season.</p> <p><i><b>Aims.</b></i>The impact of <i>ad libitum</i> supplementation of cattle with high-quality molasses blocks (20 kg) containing either 8% urea (UMB) or nil urea (MB), was examined.</p> <p><i><b>Methods.</b></i> Field trials on smallholder farms compared weight changes and average daily gains (ADG = g/day) data of young calves <8 months of age (<i>n =</i> 25)" growing calves 8–24 months (<i>n =</i> 35) and lactating cows (<i>n =</i> 46), of the indigenous breed when accessing either UMB or MB, with data being collected at Weeks 1, 4, 8 and 12. A pen study was also conducted at a research station involving mature, lactating crossbred cows (<i>n =</i> 37). Surveys of farming families experiencing use of the blocks was conducted (<i>n =</i> 20).</p> <p><i><b>Key results.</b></i> On smallholder farms, animals accessing UMBs were heavier than those accessing MBs at every collection day and in young calves these differences were statistically significant (<i>P </i>< 0.05). ADGs were higher in cattle accessing UMB than in those accessing MBs. Young calves had the highest ADG (251–265 g/day), followed by growing calves (198–237 g/day) and lactating cows (187–190 g/day), although differences in ADG between UMB and MB cohorts were not considered significant (young calves <i>P =</i> 0.562" growing calves <i>P =</i> 0.509" and lactating cows <i>P =</i> 0.993). Results from the pen study identified that ADGs were not significantly different (<i>P =</i> 0.933) between crossbred cows accessing MBs (236 g/day) and cows accessing UMBs (229 g/day). Surveys of farmers using blocks confirmed that their animals were calmer and healthier, and had better coat condition with minimal external parasites" these farmers wished to purchase the blocks and were willing to pay a mean up to US$6.5 ± 2.3 per block.</p> <p><i><b>Conclusions.</b></i> Provision of UMBs and MBs in Laos in the late dry season improved cattle growth rates, which is consistent with previous studies and far superior to the base-line data from Laos demonstrating declining ADGs. Farmers considered that the blocks contributed greatly to herd management and improved sale-ability of their cattle.</p> <p><i><b>Implications.</b></i> Provision of molasses blocks on low-input smallholder farms in developing countries significantly improves production efficiency, offering an 'entry point' intervention while forages are becoming established.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleProvision of urea–molasses blocks to improve smallholder cattle weight gain during the late dry season in tropical developing countries: studies from Lao PDRen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/an20517en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameP Aen
local.contributor.firstnameSen
local.contributor.firstnameLen
local.contributor.firstnameSen
local.contributor.firstnamePen
local.contributor.firstnameR Den
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaillolmo@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage503en
local.format.endpage513en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume61en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.title.subtitlestudies from Lao PDRen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameWindsoren
local.contributor.lastnameNampanyaen
local.contributor.lastnameOlmoen
local.contributor.lastnameKhounsyen
local.contributor.lastnamePhengsavanhen
local.contributor.lastnameBushen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lolmoen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8175-8216en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/59340en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleProvision of urea–molasses blocks to improve smallholder cattle weight gain during the late dry season in tropical developing countriesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteFunding for this project was initially through the Australian Centre for International Agriculture Research (ACIAR, http:// aciar.gov.au/), Projects AH/2012/067 and 068, with continued support provided by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) Business Partnership Platform (BPP) project ‘Enhancing Livelihoods of Smallholder Farmers in Laos’.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorWindsor, P Aen
local.search.authorNampanya, Sen
local.search.authorOlmo, Len
local.search.authorKhounsy, Sen
local.search.authorPhengsavanh, Pen
local.search.authorBush, R Den
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e9c8eed0-da42-4132-81ba-72b76874fc42en
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e9c8eed0-da42-4132-81ba-72b76874fc42en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e9c8eed0-da42-4132-81ba-72b76874fc42en
local.subject.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.date.moved2024-05-16en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/ProvisionOlmo2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished Version638.53 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Oct 5, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons