Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58867
Title: The ecological nature of whole river macrosystems: new perspectives from the riverine ecosystem synthesis
Contributor(s): Thorp, James H (author); Thoms, Martin C  (author)orcid ; Delong, Michael D (author); Maasri, Alain (author)
Publication Date: 2023-06-16
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1184433
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58867
Abstract: 

Opportunities to understand and protect natural aquatic diversity in both relatively pristine and managed rivers can be enhanced with a comprehensive, system-wide understanding of a river’s hydrogeomorpholgy and its effects on ecological structure and functioning from the river’s headwaters to its terminus in an ocean, lake, or natural endorheic basin. While a moderate number of macrosystem ecology studies have been undertaken recently in headwaters, comparable ecological approaches to studying whole rivers or at least their larger components from upstream to downstream are relatively rare. This is partially correlated with the paucity of applicable river ecosystem models developed over the last half century which could otherwise provide diverse, testable tenets (hypotheses). This manuscript focuses on a 15+ year updated, system-wide analysis of the applicability of the 17 tenets included in our previously published, lotic model - the Riverine Ecosystem Synthesis, or RES. We also propose here four new tenets and analyze the system-wide applicability of the revised RES. Those new tenets hypothesize that: (H-18) “The range and degree of impacts of a Functional Process Zone on biodiversity and ecological processes differ among several factors, including types of FPZs, total river area covered, and dependent variables examined, even in the same river network position”; (H-19) “The degree of ecological differences among types of FPZs vary seasonally with the process being examined while also differing among types of life history characteristics - especially when contrasting responses among seasonal periods of either maximum or minimum growth and reproduction”; (H-20) “The relative importance of in-stream versus watershed drivers of ecological processes in streams can vary within macrosystems and among ecoregions and partially depends on elevation, terrestrial characteristics (natural or human modified), and FPZ type and extent”; and (H-21) “The provision of ecosystem services varies significantly with FPZ type, river size, and location vis-à-vis human populations”. Where appropriate, we also evaluate aspects of several other models published by colleagues that pertain to river ecology.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, v.11, p. 1-11
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 2296-701X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410203
370901
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180303 Fresh, ground and surface water biodiversity
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/TheEcologicalThoms2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished version4.13 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on May 25, 2024

Page view(s)

176
checked on May 5, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons