Do reptile responses to habitat structure and time since fire depend on landscape structure?

Abstract

<p>Land use changes, such as the development of agriculture and plantation forestry, and altered fire regimes, are major drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, influencing the availability of suitable habitat for species. Reptiles are sensitive to both these processes as they are influenced by native vegetation extent and habitat structure. While much is known about the independent effects of fire and land use change on species distributions, few studies have investigated potential interactive effects" specifically, whether the influence of site-scale variables on reptiles depends on the properties of the surrounding landscape. We sampled reptiles at 107 sites in fire-prone heathy woodland, interspersed with plantation forestry and agriculture in south-west Victoria, Australia. We investigated the responses of seven reptile species to both site-scale variables (time since fire and several measures of habitat structure) and landscape-scale variables (extent of native vegetation and plantations and the presence of pasture within a 3.14 square km area) to 1) identify whether species' responses to fire and habitat depended on landscape structure, and 2) examine the relative influence of time since fire, habitat structure and landscape structure on reptile abundance. We predicted that responses to site-scale variables would vary with a key landscape structure variable: the amount of native vegetation cover. Further, we predicted that site-scale variables would be stronger predictors of species abundance than landscape-scale variables. Generalised linear models, accounting for imperfect detection, were used to estimate species responses to site and landscape-scale predictors. For two species (<i>Amphibolurus muricatus</i> and <i>Liopholis whitii</i>) there was evidence that their responses to site-scale variables depended on landscape structure. However, contrary to our first prediction, native vegetation cover was not the only landscape structure variable that influenced species' responses to site-scale variables. Three species (<i>Acritoscincus duperreyi</i>, <i>A. muricatus</i>, and <i>Lerista bougainvillii</i>) responded to both habitat structure and landscape structure variables, though the relative influence of the variables at the different scales was varied among the species. One species (<i>Lampropholis guichenoti</i>) responded to fire and habitat structure variables at the site-scale but did not respond to landscape structure. One species (<i>Aprasia striolata</i>) responded to landscape structure variables but not to site-scale variables. Our second prediction, that site-scale variables would be the strongest predictors of abundance, was true for two species, but overall, our results were varied, with species responding at both scales. Examining species' responses to drivers at multiple spatial scales is essential for conservation management, as even species with low dispersal capacity such as reptiles can respond to processes occurring at large spatial scales.</p>