Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58392
Title: Methodological Naturalism Undercuts Ontological Naturalism
Contributor(s): Forrest, Peter  (author)
Publication Date: 2023
DOI: 10.5406/21521123.60.1.08
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58392
Abstract: 

Naturalism, as I understand it, includes cosmological naturalism, ontological naturalism and methodological naturalism. After clarifying these three theses I argue that the combination of ontological with methodological naturalism is untenable. I do so by providing a pro tanto case against ontological naturalism and show that it can be resisted, but only by abandoning methodological naturalism. The pro tanto case is that ontological naturalism requires a version of what I call Redundancy Nominalism, but methodological naturalists should either reject it or at very least treat it, and hence ontological naturalism, as a speculation.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: American Philosophical Quarterly, 60(1), p. 99-110
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 2152-1123
0003-0481
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 500309 Metaphysics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.