Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDickson, Emily Jen
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Dana L Men
dc.contributor.authorMonk, Jessica Een
dc.contributor.authorLea, Jim Men
dc.contributor.authorColditz, Ian Gen
dc.contributor.authorLee, Carolineen
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-12T06:36:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-12T06:36:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Animal Behaviour Science, v.254, p. 1-10en
dc.identifier.issn1872-9045en
dc.identifier.issn0168-1591en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58299-
dc.description.abstract<p>Public scrutiny surrounds the intensive feedlot finishing of beef cattle, likely due to the assumption that cattle cannot perform their full repertoire of natural behaviours. However, it is not well-known how certain aspects of the environment influence both cattle perception of a feedlot environment and the behaviours they perform within it, particularly with increasing levels of mud. The objective of this study was to perform a Y-maze test to assess the preference of Angus steers for either a pasture environment or a feedlot at three pad scores, which were based on increasing mud depth relative to the cattle's hoof and leg. Cattle were tested both morning and afternoon for ten consecutive days, with lying behaviours and number of steps measured using IceQube® accelerometers. Here we show that day affected cattle's preference for pasture versus feedlot environments, with choice alternating between consecutive days (P < 0.001), and cattle also exhibited a preference for pasture at night (P = 0.04). Although the paddock environment was preferred at all pad scores, increasing mud level did not significantly influence the preference of cattle for either environment (P = 0.39), and it is likely that both environments contained rewarding stimuli. There was a significant interaction between pad score and location for lying behaviours and number of steps taken (all P < 0.001), with the highest pad score being associated with reductions in these behaviours within the feedlot. Evidence of a rebound effect for lying behaviours in the paddock for this pad score indicates that high levels of mud may negatively impact welfare when no alternative space to lie is provided.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Animal Behaviour Scienceen
dc.relation.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/62544en
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleIncreasing mud levels in a feedlot influences beef cattle behaviours but not preference for feedlot or pasture environmentsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105718en
local.contributor.firstnameEmily Jen
local.contributor.firstnameDana L Men
local.contributor.firstnameJessica Een
local.contributor.firstnameJim Men
local.contributor.firstnameIan Gen
local.contributor.firstnameCarolineen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Rural & Environmental Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailedickso2@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emaildcampb38@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjmonk5@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailicoldit2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailclee31@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeThe Netherlandsen
local.identifier.runningnumber105718en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage10en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume254en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameDicksonen
local.contributor.lastnameCampbellen
local.contributor.lastnameMonken
local.contributor.lastnameLeaen
local.contributor.lastnameColditzen
local.contributor.lastnameLeeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:edickso2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:dcampb38en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jmonk5en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:icoldit2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:clee31en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1145-5740en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-4571-2285en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/58299en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleIncreasing mud levels in a feedlot influences beef cattle behaviours but not preference for feedlot or pasture environmentsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorDickson, Emily Jen
local.search.authorCampbell, Dana L Men
local.search.authorMonk, Jessica Een
local.search.authorLea, Jim Men
local.search.authorColditz, Ian Gen
local.search.authorLee, Carolineen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3da62d6b-5b56-4dec-a413-119bc105858een
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.for2020300306 Animal welfareen
local.subject.seo2020100401 Beef cattleen
local.codeupdate.date2024-08-01T10:33:44.126en
local.codeupdate.epersondcampb38@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203003 Animal productionen
local.original.seo2020tbden
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/IncreasingDicksonCampbellMonkColditzLee2022JournalArticle.htmPublished version164.28 kBHTMLView/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons