Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58294
Title: Using Principal Component Analysis to Compare the Physical Qualities Between Academy and International Youth Rugby League Players
Contributor(s): McCormack, Sam (author); Jones, Ben  (author); Scantlebury, Sean (author); Collins, Neil (author); Owen, Cameron (author); Till, Kevin
Publication Date: 2021
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2021-0049
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58294
Abstract: 

Purpose: To compare the physical qualities between academy and international youth rugby league (RL) players using principal component analysis. Methods: Six hundred fifty-four males (age=16.7 [1.4] y" height = 178.4 [13.3] cm" body mass = 82.2 [14.5] kg) from 11 English RL academies participated in this study. Participants completed anthropometric, power (countermovement jump), strength (isometric midthigh pull" IMTP), speed (10 and 40 m speed), and aerobic endurance (prone Yo-Yo IR1) assessments. Principal component analysis was conducted on all physical quality measures. A 1-way analysis of variance with effect sizes was performed on 2 principal components (PCs) to identify differences between academy and international backs, forwards, and pivots at under 16 and 18 age groups. Results: Physical quality measures were reduced to 2 PCs explaining 69.4% of variance. The first PC (35.3%) was influenced by maximum and 10-m momentum, absolute IMTP, and body mass. Ten and forty-meter speed, body mass and fat, prone Yo-Yo, IMTP relative, maximum speed, and countermovement jump contributed to PC2 (34.1%). Significant differences (P < .05, effect size = −1.83) were identified between U18 academy and international backs within PC1. Conclusion: Running momentum, absolute IMTP, and body mass contributed to PC1, while numerous qualities influenced PC2. The physical qualities of academy and international youth RL players are similar, excluding U18 backs. Principal component analysis can reduce the dimensionality of a data set and help identify overall differences between playing levels. Findings suggest that RL practitioners should measure multiple physical qualities when assessing physical performance.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 16(12), p. 1880-1887
Publisher: Human Kinetics, Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1555-0273
1555-0265
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 4207 Sports science and exercise
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: tbd
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.