Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58265
Title: Murray-Darling Basin Plan mark II. What should stakeholders plan for?
Contributor(s): Martin, Paul  (author)orcid ; Alexandra, Jason (author); Holley, Cameron (author); Thoms, Martin  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2023-07
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2023.2173049
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/58265
Abstract: 

The revised Murray-Darling Basin Plan is scheduled for 2026. Given the Plans complexity, and issues involved in the revision it is worth asking what will be the main drivers of change? What changes can reasonably be anticipated? What preparations should stakeholders make for their engagement in the planning process? As we move towards the next Basin Plan, there are multiple wheels in motion that could shape the future. Several factors we anticipate being important are examined. Our aim is to stimulate stakeholders to think about and prepare for major contingencies that could affect their interests. We focus on those that will likely affect water availability, and changes in policy and water-governance by public agencies. We take the starting point that rivers are complex social-ecological systems, within which structural circum-stances and forms of social capital will affect individuals' and communities' abilities to max-imise what they achieve from their natural assets, and their resilience to unfavourable contingencies. We conclude with some observations about how stakeholders might strengthen their ability to respond to opportunities or threats. While the future is always uncertain and all planning processes are flawed, how stakeholders conceive of and respond to today's challenges will substantially affect their capacity to be resilient.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 27(2), p. 211-222
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Australasia
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 2204-227X
1324-1583
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 4802 Environmental and resources law
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: TBD
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
School of Law

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/MurrayMartinThoms2023JounalArticle.pdfPublished version860.76 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons