Does perceived wellness influence technical-tactical match performance? A study in youth international rugby using partial least squares correlation analysis

Abstract

<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between matchday wellness status and a technical–tactical performance construct during rugby match-play. One hundred andthirty-three male rugby union players (73 forwards and 60 backs) from five under-18 national squads who participated in the under-18 Six Nations competition completed a subjective wellness questionnaire on each matchday morning. Players subjectively rated each item (sleep quality, fatigue, muscle soreness, stress and mood) on afive-point Likert scale to calculate their daily wellness status (i.e. difference between matchday and baseline perceived wellness).Technical–tactical performance during match-play was quantified by coding individual key performance indicators (e.g. number of carries, number of tackles). Partial least squares correlation analysis (PLSCA) was employed to compute the latent variables of perceived wellness status (<i>X</i> matrix) and technical–tactical performance (<i>Y</i> matrix) for each player observation (<i>n</i>= 271). The latent variables are a construct of each variable group, enabling higher dimensional data to be visualised more simply. Linear mixed-effect models were later conducted to assess the relationships between the latent variables. The effect of perceived wellness status on technical–tactical performance was statistically significant in forwards (<i>p</i> = .042), not statistically significant in backs (<i>p</i> = .120) and accounted for 4.9% and 1.9% variance in the technical–tactical performance construct, respectively. The findings of this study suggest that perceived wellness status can influence technical–tactical match performance, but the practical significance of these findings should be interpreted with caution given the amount of variance in technical–tactical performance accounted by the models.</p>