Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57996
Title: Phantom Eye Syndrome: Patient Experiences after Enucleation for Uveal Melanoma
Contributor(s): Hope-Stone, Laura (author); Brown, Stephen L  (author)orcid ; Heimann, Heinrich (author); Damato, Bertil (author); Salmon, Peter (author)
Publication Date: 2015-08-01
Early Online Version: 2015-05-21
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.005
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57996
Abstract: 

Purpose: Patients undergoing enucleation for uveal melanoma need to be informed of the possibility of phantom eye syndrome (PES). The number with uveal melanoma in PES studies has been small. Aims were to: (1) determine the prevalence, symptoms, and characteristics of PES and to test associations of PES symptoms with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics; (2) examine the interrelatedness of PES symptoms; and (3) explore the emotional valence of PES and the relationship to anxiety and depression.

Design: Cross-sectional questionnaire.

Participants: Patients (n = 179) with uveal melanoma enucleated 4 to 52 months previously.

Methods: Questionnaire on PES. Responses to a routine audit of mood obtained from clinical records

Main Outcome Measures: Patients were asked about 3 symptoms: pain, visual sensations, and a feeling of seeing through the removed eye. Mood was assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Results: Of 179 respondents, 108 (60.3%) experienced symptoms: 86 reported (48%) visual sensations, 50 reported (28%) seeing, and 42 reported (23%) pain; 14 (7.8%) reported all 3 symptoms. At the time of the questionnaire, 31 (17%) experienced 1 or more symptoms daily. Women were more likely to report pain (odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08e4.40). Younger patients at enucleation were more likely to report pain (t= 4.13; degrees of freedom (df), 177; P< 0.001) and visual sensations (t= 2.11; df, 177; P< 0.05). Patients studied sooner after enucleation were more likely to report seeing (ManneWhitney U, 2343; P< 0.05). Pain and seeing were intercorrelated (chi-square, 5.47; Φ = 0.18; df, 1; P< 0.05), pain with visual sensations (chi-square, 3.91; F Φ = 0.15; df, 1; P< 0.05) and seeing with visual sensations (chi-square, 34.22; F Φ = 0.45; df, 1; P< 0.001). Twenty of 108 patients (18.5%) found symptoms disturbing, and 21 of 108 (19.4%) pleasurable. Patients reporting pain were more anxious (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.38e9.03) and depressed (OR, 13.26; 95% CI, 3.87e46.21).

Conclusions: Patients should be informed of PES symptoms. Pain may indicate anxiety or depression; this needs research to determine cause and effect.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Ophthalmology, 122(8), p. 1585-1590
Publisher: Elsevier Inc
Place of Publication: United States
ISSN: 1549-4713
0161-6420
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 5203 Clinical and health psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: TBD
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.