Title: | Sequencing the threat and recommendation components of persuasive messages differentially improves the effectiveness of high- and low-distressing imagery in an anti-alcohol message in students |
Contributor(s): | Brown, Stephen L (author) ; West, Charlotte (author) |
Publication Date: | 2015-05 |
DOI: | 10.1111/bjhp.12103 |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57995 |
Abstract: | | Objectives. Distressing imagery is often used to improve the persuasiveness of massreach health promotion messages, but its effectiveness may be limited because audiences avoid attending to content. Prior self-affirmation or self-efficacy inductions have been shown to reduce avoidance and improve audience responsiveness to distressing messages, but these are difficult to introduce into a mass-reach context. Reasoning that a behavioural recommendation may have a similar effect, we reversed the traditional threat-behavioural recommendation health promotion message sequence.
Design. 2 9 2 experimental design: Factor 1, high- and low-distress images; Factor 2, threat-recommendation and recommendation-threat sequences.
Methods. Ninety-one students were exposed to an identical text message accompanied by high- or low-distress imagery presented in threat-recommendation and recommendation-threat sequences.
Results. For the high-distress message, greater persuasion was observed for the recommendation-threat than the threat-recommendation sequence. This was partially mediated by participants’ greater self-exposure to the threat component of the message, which we attribute to the effect of sequence in reducing attentional avoidance. For the low-distress message, greater persuasion was observed for the threat-recommendation sequence, which was not mediated by reading time allocated to the threat.
Conclusions. Tailoring message sequence to suit the degree of distress that message developers wish to induce provides a tool that could improve persuasive messages. These findings provide a first step in this process and discuss further steps needed to consolidate and expand these findings.
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(2), p. 324-340 |
Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Place of Publication: | United Kingdom |
ISSN: | 2044-8287 1359-107X |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 5203 Clinical and health psychology |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | TBD |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology
|