Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57840
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Ivanen
dc.contributor.authorBlair, Graemeen
dc.contributor.authorMacLeod, Donalden
dc.contributor.authorTill, Rayen
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T04:59:12Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-19T04:59:12Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.citationCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54(9), p. 1266-1282en
dc.identifier.issn1532-2416en
dc.identifier.issn0010-3624en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/57840-
dc.description.abstract<p>The aim is to examine the nutrient ion dynamics in a Vertisol soil undergoing waterlogging to ascertain whether soil solution concentration and/or nutrient uptake dynamics are the cause of boll shedding in cotton. Cotton was grown in pots, and the soil waterlogged after 76 days at which time injections of <sup>33</sup>P and <sup>86</sup>Rb were made to trace phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) dynamics. After seven days, waterlogging in the pots were drained and an injection of <sup>32</sup>p was made to trace P dynamics during the recovery period. Redox fell rapidly during waterlogging, and soil solution concentrations of P, K, sodium (Na), and manganese (Mn) increased. Biomass accumulation was less in the waterlogged treatment than in the non-waterlogged control. In the 7-day recovery period, shoot biomass increased in the waterlogged treatment and root biomass weight continued to decline. Recovery of <sup>33</sup>P was 10 times higher in the control than in the waterlogged treatment during the 7-day waterlogging period treatment. Uptake of <sup>86</sup>Rb in the control treatment was more than twice that of the waterlogged treatment during this period. Uptake of both<sup>33</sup>P and <sup>86</sup>Rb increased during recovery but remained higher in the control treatment. Uptake of <sup>32</sup>p occurred during post-waterlogging but remained higher in the control treatment. Reduced uptake of P and K during waterlogging is most likely due to damage to the uptake mechanisms of the roots rather than a reduction in the concentration of nutrients in the soil solution under waterlogged conditions.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Incen
dc.relation.ispartofCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysisen
dc.titlePhosphorus and Potassium Ion Dynamics in a Vertisol Soil and in Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L) During a Waterlogging Eventen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00103624.2022.2139392en
dc.subject.keywordssoil solutionen
dc.subject.keywordsmanganeseen
dc.subject.keywordsphosphorusen
dc.subject.keywordspotassiumen
dc.subject.keywordsredoxen
dc.subject.keywordsAgronomyen
dc.subject.keywordsPlant Sciencesen
dc.subject.keywordsChemistry, Analyticalen
dc.subject.keywordsSoil Scienceen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultureen
dc.subject.keywordsChemistryen
dc.subject.keywordsIsotopesen
local.contributor.firstnameIvanen
local.contributor.firstnameGraemeen
local.contributor.firstnameDonalden
local.contributor.firstnameRayen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailgblair2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage1266en
local.format.endpage1282en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume54en
local.identifier.issue9en
local.contributor.lastnameMacLeoden
local.contributor.lastnameBlairen
local.contributor.lastnameMacLeoden
local.contributor.lastnameTillen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gblair2en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/57840en
local.date.onlineversion2022-11-01-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitlePhosphorus and Potassium Ion Dynamics in a Vertisol Soil and in Cotton Plants (Gossypium hirsutum L) During a Waterlogging Eventen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe work was supported by the Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Cotton Production [UNE2001].en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMacLeod, Ivanen
local.search.authorBlair, Graemeen
local.search.authorMacLeod, Donalden
local.search.authorTill, Rayen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2023en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7881cff9-4f60-426e-b8e3-0c2363c1ede0en
local.subject.for2020300405 Crop and pasture productionen
local.subject.seo2020TBDen
local.codeupdate.date2024-09-01T10:41:30.721en
local.codeupdate.epersongblair2@une.edu.auen
local.codeupdate.finalisedtrueen
local.original.for20203004 Crop and pasture productionen
local.original.seo2020TBDen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.