Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5676
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Giselaen
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-21T09:44:00Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationBrain Research Bulletin, 76(3), p. 253-263en
dc.identifier.issn1873-2747en
dc.identifier.issn0361-9230en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/5676-
dc.description.abstractThe ability to communicate intentionally and referentially about predators by issuing specific and unique alarm calls per predator type, usually considered indicative of forebrain activity, is generally regarded as evidence of complex cognition. However, the neurobiology of such expressions is not well-understood and the relationship of song to alarm calls is not clear. In the very few studies of brain activity in calls of non-songbirds and songbirds so far, it was found that it is only the midbrain that is involved in the production of calls. The paper argues that such midbrain activity, even in so-called referential signalling, may have been misconstrued as higher cognition when, in fact, it may be merely indicative of a well-preserved (even 'clever') midbrain survival mechanism of prey species, and may be based on instantaneous 'non-thinking' activities of the midbrain. This does not rule out that, in specific species of songbird and in specific types of calls, the production of alarm calls may indeed involve activity and interaction of nuclei in midbrain and forebrain. Such a possible interaction in the production of vocalisations (unlearned and learned) has also been shown in some songbirds, including the zebra finch. A study of alarm calls in Australian magpies ('Gymnorhina tibicen'), a prolific songbird, is used here to give an example of possible considered responses in alarm calling based on behavioural evidence.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Incen
dc.relation.ispartofBrain Research Bulletinen
dc.titleAlarm calls and referentially in Australian magpies: Between midbrain and forebrain, can a case be made for complex cognition?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.006en
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal Behaviouren
local.contributor.firstnameGiselaen
local.subject.for2008060801 Animal Behaviouren
local.subject.seo2008970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailgkaplan@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.identifier.epublicationsrecordune-20100415-104558en
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage253en
local.format.endpage263en
local.identifier.scopusid40149091382en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume76en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.title.subtitleBetween midbrain and forebrain, can a case be made for complex cognition?en
local.contributor.lastnameKaplanen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gkaplanen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:5812en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAlarm calls and referentially in Australian magpiesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKaplan, Giselaen
local.uneassociationUnknownen
local.identifier.wosid000256724000011en
local.year.published2008en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Mar 9, 2024

Page view(s)

968
checked on Mar 9, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.