Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55211
Title: | Heterogeneity in the reporting of blood pressure variability: high time for methodological consensus | Contributor(s): | Tully, Phillip J (author) ; Tzourio, Christophe (author) | Publication Date: | 2020-03 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.1093/ageing/afz155 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55211 | Abstract: | Intra-individual blood pressure variability (BPV) signifies compromised vascular autoregulatory processes. A systematic review of 63 BPV studies, with data from 550,437 individuals, found substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of BPV in relation to cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Significant heterogeneity in the reporting of BPV poses as a substantial barrier to quantifying the extent to which BPV contributes unique prognostic utility over and above mean blood pressure. Concerted efforts should be made to standardise BPV reporting, alongside mean blood pressure, to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying high BPV and target organ damage. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Age and Ageing, 49(2), p. 168-170 | Publisher: | Oxford University Press | Place of Publication: | United Kingdom | ISSN: | 1468-2834 0002-0729 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases) | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 200199 Clinical health not elsewhere classified | HERDC Category Description: | C4 Letter of Note |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.