Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55211
Title: Heterogeneity in the reporting of blood pressure variability: high time for methodological consensus
Contributor(s): Tully, Phillip J  (author)orcid ; Tzourio, Christophe (author)
Publication Date: 2020-03
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afz155Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55211
Abstract: Intra-individual blood pressure variability (BPV) signifies compromised vascular autoregulatory processes. A systematic review of 63 BPV studies, with data from 550,437 individuals, found substantial heterogeneity in the reporting of BPV in relation to cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Significant heterogeneity in the reporting of BPV poses as a substantial barrier to quantifying the extent to which BPV contributes unique prognostic utility over and above mean blood pressure. Concerted efforts should be made to standardise BPV reporting, alongside mean blood pressure, to better understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying high BPV and target organ damage.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Age and Ageing, 49(2), p. 168-170
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1468-2834
0002-0729
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200199 Clinical health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Category Description: C4 Letter of Note
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
closedpublished/HeterogeneityTully2020JournalArticle.pdf106.36 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.