Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55126
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, Victoria Aen
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Saul Aen
dc.contributor.authorRader, Rominaen
dc.contributor.authorMayfield, Margaret Men
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T04:27:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-11T04:27:23Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationDiversity and Distributions, 28(6), p. 1269-1281en
dc.identifier.issn1472-4642en
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55126-
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Aim:</b> Pollination plays a crucial role in the conservation of many plant species persisting in fragmented, human-dominated landscapes. Pollinators are known to be instrumental in maintaining genetic diversity and metapopulation dynamics for many plant species and are important for providing ecological services that are essential in agricultural landscapes where populations of native plants are highly isolated. Numerous studies have explored the value of remnant native vegetation for supporting pollination services to crop species, yet the effect of mass-flowering crops on the pollinator communities and the pollination services they provide to native plant communities persisting in fragmented landscapes are less well understood. Here, we assess the influence of the presence and phenology of a mass-flowering crop to pollinator community structure, abundance, and pollen load composition in remnant vegetation in complex agricultural landscapes.<br/> <b>Location:</b> South-west Western Australia, Australia.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> We recorded the composition and abundance of insect flower visitors and their pollen loads in isolated remnants of York Gum-Jam woodlands adjacent to canola (insect-attracting) or wheat (non-insect-attracting) fields over two years.<br/> <b>Results:</b> All bees were much more sensitive to adjacent crop type (neighbouring canola or wheat) than non-bee pollinators. Honeybees were the most abundant pollinators in canola fields during peak flowering. Honeybee abundance increased in canola-adjacent reserves post canola bloom, potentially indicating a movement into reserves as crop flowering waned. Native bees were the most diverse in remnant vegetation. Pollen loads of native bees were more mixed (increased pollen richness and evenness) when sampled next to canola fields compared to wheat fields.<br/> <b>Main conclusion:</b> The availability of potential insect pollinators to remnant wildflower communities in agricultural landscapes is context dependent. Whether sampled communities were adjacent to wheat or canola in a landscape significantly impacted the abundance of potential pollinators in certain landscape elements, but not others, and the composition of pollen loads carried by these insects. Results offer novel insights about the influence of landscape context on pollinator communities and the potential pollination services available for the conservation of native plant species in highly fragmented agricultural landscapes.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofDiversity and Distributionsen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleAdjacent crop type impacts potential pollinator communities and their pollination services in remnants of natural vegetationen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ddi.13537en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordswild plant pollinationen
dc.subject.keywordsnon-crop habitatsen
dc.subject.keywordspollen loadsen
dc.subject.keywordssemi-natural habitatsen
dc.subject.keywordsunmanaged pollinatorsen
dc.subject.keywordsBiodiversity Conservationen
dc.subject.keywordsEcologyen
dc.subject.keywordsBiodiversity & Conservationen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Sciences & Ecologyen
dc.subject.keywordscanolaen
dc.subject.keywordsflower visitor abundanceen
dc.subject.keywordshoneybee competitionen
dc.subject.keywordsmass-flowering cropsen
dc.subject.keywordsnative plant communitiesen
local.contributor.firstnameVictoria Aen
local.contributor.firstnameSaul Aen
local.contributor.firstnameRominaen
local.contributor.firstnameMargaret Men
local.relation.isfundedbyARCen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailrrader@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.grant.numberDP140100574en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage1269en
local.format.endpage1281en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume28en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameReynoldsen
local.contributor.lastnameCunninghamen
local.contributor.lastnameRaderen
local.contributor.lastnameMayfielden
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rraderen
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-9056-9118en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/55126en
local.date.onlineversion2022-04-26-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAdjacent crop type impacts potential pollinator communities and their pollination services in remnants of natural vegetationen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteVAR acknowledges support from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation through a postgraduate research grant. This project was also partially funded by the Australian Research Council (DP140100574) awarded to MMM.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.grantdescriptionARC/DP140100574en
local.search.authorReynolds, Victoria Aen
local.search.authorCunningham, Saul Aen
local.search.authorRader, Rominaen
local.search.authorMayfield, Margaret Men
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/feb00a73-1b4a-4f0b-bfb9-ae3a8066db0een
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosidWOS:000787591200001en
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/feb00a73-1b4a-4f0b-bfb9-ae3a8066db0een
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/feb00a73-1b4a-4f0b-bfb9-ae3a8066db0een
local.subject.for2020410204 Ecosystem services (incl. pollination)en
local.subject.for2020410401 Conservation and biodiversityen
local.subject.for2020310308 Terrestrial ecologyen
local.subject.seo2020180603 Evaluation, allocation, and impacts of land useen
local.subject.seo2020180601 Assessment and management of terrestrial ecosystemsen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/AdjacentRader2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.59 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons