Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55108
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTorgbor, Benjamin Adjahen
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Muhammad Moshiuren
dc.contributor.authorBrinkhoff, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Priyakanten
dc.contributor.authorRobson, Andrewen
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-07T06:27:55Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-07T06:27:55Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-02-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 15(12), p. 1-26en
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55108-
dc.description.abstractAccurate pre-harvest yield forecasting of mango is essential to the industry as it supports better decision making around harvesting logistics and forward selling, thus optimizing productivity and reducing food waste. Current methods for yield forecasting such as manually counting 2–3% of the orchard can be accurate but are very time inefficient and labour intensive. More recent evaluations of technological solutions such as remote (satellite) and proximal (on ground) sensing have provided very encouraging results, but they still require infield in-season sampling for calibration, the technology comes at a significant cost, and commercial availability is limited, especially for vehicle-mounted sensors. This study presents the first evaluation of a ”time series”—based remote sensing method for yield forecasting of mango, a method that does not require infield fruit counts and utilizes freely available satellite imagery. Historic yield data from 2015 to 2022 were sourced from 51 individual orchard blocks from two farms (AH and MK) in the Northern Territory of Australia. Time series measures of the canopy reflectance properties of the blocks were obtained from Landsat 7 and 8 satellite data for the 2015–2022 growing seasons. From the imagery, the following vegetation indices (VIs) were derived: EVI, GNDVI, NDVI, and LSWI, whilst corresponding weather variables (rainfall (Prec), temperature (Tmin/Tmax), evapotranspiration (ETo), solar radiation (Rad), and vapor pressure deficit (vpd)) were also sourced from SILO data. To determine the relationships among weather and remotely sensed measures of canopy throughout the growing season and the yield achieved (at the block level and the farm level), six machine learning (ML) algorithms, namely random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBOOST), RIDGE, LASSO and partial least square regression (PLSR), were trialed. The EVI/GNDVI and Prec/Tmin were found to be the best RS and weather predictors, respectively. The block-level combined RS/weather-based RF model for 2021 produced the best result (MAE = 2.9 t/ha), marginally better than the RS only RF model (MAE = 3.4 t/ha). The farm-level model error (FLEM) was generally lower than the block-level model error, for both the combined RS/weather-based RF model (farm = 3.7%, block (NMAE) = 33.6% for 2021) and the RS-based model (farm = 4.3%, block = 38.4% for 2021). Further testing of the RS/weather-based RF models over six additional orchards (other than AH and MK) produced errors ranging between 24% and 39% from 2016 to 2020. Although accuracies of prediction did vary at both the block level and the farm level, this preliminary study demonstrates the potential of a ”time series” RS method for predicting mango yields. The benefits to the mango industry are that it utilizes freely available imagery, requires no infield calibration, and provides predictions several months before the commercial harvest. Therefore, this outcome not only presents a more adoptable option for the industry, but also better supports automation and scalability in terms of block-, farm-, regional, and national level forecasting.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleIntegrating Remote Sensing and Weather Variables for Mango Yield Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approachen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs15123075en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameBenjamin Adjahen
local.contributor.firstnameMuhammad Moshiuren
local.contributor.firstnameJamesen
local.contributor.firstnamePriyakanten
local.contributor.firstnameAndrewen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailbtorgbor@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmrahma37@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjbrinkho@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpsinha2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailarobson7@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeBasel, Switzerlanden
local.identifier.runningnumber3075en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage26en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume15en
local.identifier.issue12en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameTorgboren
local.contributor.lastnameRahmanen
local.contributor.lastnameBrinkhoffen
local.contributor.lastnameSinhaen
local.contributor.lastnameRobsonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mrahma37en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jbrinkhoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:psinha2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:arobson7en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6430-0588en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0721-2458en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0278-6866en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5762-8980en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/55108en
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleIntegrating Remote Sensing and Weather Variables for Mango Yield Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approachen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis study has been funded by the Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources as part of its Rural R&D for Profit program and Horticulture Innovation Australia Ltd., grant number ST15002 (Multi-scale Monitoring Tools for Managing Australian Tree Crops) as well as with support from a Remote Sensing scholarship granted by the Applied Agricultural Remote Sensing Centre (AARSC) of the University of New England, Australia.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorTorgbor, Benjamin Adjahen
local.search.authorRahman, Muhammad Moshiuren
local.search.authorBrinkhoff, Jamesen
local.search.authorSinha, Priyakanten
local.search.authorRobson, Andrewen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/954d59c1-139a-455a-b7d7-113a8d3892b3en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2023en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/954d59c1-139a-455a-b7d7-113a8d3892b3en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/954d59c1-139a-455a-b7d7-113a8d3892b3en
local.subject.for2020300206 Agricultural spatial analysis and modellingen
local.subject.for2020300802 Horticultural crop growth and developmenten
local.subject.for2020401304 Photogrammetry and remote sensingen
local.subject.seo2020260513 Stone fruit (excl. avocado)en
local.subject.seo2020260516 Tropical fruiten
local.subject.seo2020280101 Expanding knowledge in the agricultural, food and veterinary sciencesen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/IntegratingTorgborRahmanBrinkhoffSinhaRobson2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished version5.52 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons