Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/54652
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHobbs, Jazmineen
dc.contributor.authorMounter, Stuarten
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-01T03:49:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-05-01T03:49:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science, 67(3), p. 712-722en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5787en
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/54652-
dc.description.abstract<p><b>Context:</b> Proven strategies to address lamb mortality include pregnancy scanning and the differential management of single- and twin-bearing ewes. However, current adoption rates of this best-practice management by Australian producers remain low at ~20%.</p><p><b> Aims:</b> We explored producer perceptions about lamb mortality and the adoption of pregnancy scanning, and analysed whether producer characteristics, demographics, beliefs or management practices have an influence on perceptions towards pregnancy scanning or lamb survival.</p><p><b> Methods:</b> Data were collected through an on-line self-administered survey of lamb producers in New South Wales, Australia. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to summarise the data and test for interdependence of variables.</p><p><b> Key results:</b> The survey results revealed that New South Wales sheep producers have low participation rates in extension programs and low engagement in record-keeping practices. Only 4% of respondents considered current lamb mortality rates acceptable and the majority agreed that lamb mortality poses a threat to Australia's sheep industry. Findings identified numerous significant relationships between producer characteristics, demographics, beliefs, management practices, non-participation in extension programs, and perceptions towards pregnancy scanning, lamb mortality and sheep welfare. Survey participants were more likely to have adopted pregnancy scanning if they had participated in extension programs.</p><p><b> Conclusions:</b> Further extension efforts should be focused on producers who have not adopted any record-keeping practices or previously participated in extension programs. Extension should be tailored to different enterprises, owing to the influence of enterprise focus on beliefs, while also considering producer demographics.</p><p><b> Implications:</b> A strong case exists for continued investment in future marketing, education, and research, development and extension to increase the capacity of Australia's sheep industry and, in particular, to increase the adoption of pregnancy scanning.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleNew South Wales sheep producers' perceptions regarding lamb mortality and the adoption of pregnancy scanningen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/AN22339en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameJazmineen
local.contributor.firstnameStuarten
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailsmounte2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage712en
local.format.endpage722en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume67en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameHobbsen
local.contributor.lastnameMounteren
dc.identifier.staffune-id:smounte2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6637-3756en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/54652en
local.date.onlineversion2023-01-11-
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleNew South Wales sheep producers' perceptions regarding lamb mortality and the adoption of pregnancy scanningen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorHobbs, Jazmineen
local.search.authorMounter, Stuarten
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2023en
local.year.published2023en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/0cb456b0-d9c0-431f-b118-aa61522a7266en
local.subject.for2020380101 Agricultural economicsen
local.subject.for2020300208 Farm management, rural management and agribusinessen
local.subject.seo2020109902 Animal welfareen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/NewSouthMounter2023JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.25 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons