Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53993
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Rhonda Francesen
dc.contributor.authorMuller, Tanya Rebeccaen
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Annaen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T00:20:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-01T00:20:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.citationSocial Science and Medicine, v.220, p. 396-402en
dc.identifier.issn1873-5347en
dc.identifier.issn0277-9536en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53993-
dc.description.abstract<i>Rationale:</i> Cervical cancer screening registry data indicate that 43% of eligible Australian women did not screen in the latest reporting period (2014–2015). However, few prior empirical studies have examined whether the screening barriers and facilitators experienced by women can affect their screening attendance. Such informa-tion is required to inform the development of future tailored health promotion strategies.<br/> <i>Objective:</i> This study examined whether the cervical cancer screening barriers and facilitators identified by women were related to their screening history, from November 2015 and January 2016. At this time, Australian women typically undertook a Pap test every two years. They were deemed overdue for screening if they have not screened in the past 27 months (i.e., overdue by more than three months).<br/> <i>Method:</i> In this study, a large sample (<i>N</i> = 338) of women were asked about their screening history including screening status (i.e., up-to-date vs. overdue) and prior screening (i.e., never screened vs. screened), and the psychological and practical screening barriers or facilitators they had experienced.<br/> <i>Results:</i> Logistic regression analysis indicated that screening status was related to a greater number of psycho-logical barriers, but not practical barriers or facilitators. In contrast, prior screening was related to more practical and psychological screening barriers and fewer practical facilitators, but not psychological facilitators. Some individual psychological screening barriers (e.g., anxiety, embarrassment), practical barriers (e.g., lack of time) and practical facilitators (e.g., low cost of test) were related to women's screening status and prior screening.<br/> <i>Conclusions:</i> Results suggest that addressing practical cervical cancer screening facilitators (e.g., reminder prompts) and psychological screening barriers may help to optimize screening attendance in women who have never screened or are overdue for cervical cancer screening.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Science and Medicineen
dc.titleAustralian women's cervical cancer screening attendance as a function of screening barriers and facilitatorsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.038en
dc.identifier.pmid30529797en
local.contributor.firstnameRhonda Francesen
local.contributor.firstnameTanya Rebeccaen
local.contributor.firstnameAnnaen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emailrbrown34@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage396en
local.format.endpage402en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume220en
local.contributor.lastnameBrownen
local.contributor.lastnameMulleren
local.contributor.lastnameOlsenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rbrown34en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/53993en
local.date.onlineversion2018-11-28-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAustralian women's cervical cancer screening attendance as a function of screening barriers and facilitatorsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorBrown, Rhonda Francesen
local.search.authorMuller, Tanya Rebeccaen
local.search.authorOlsen, Annaen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2018en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/0a054756-b0a1-41b1-a2fe-cdedddd7e0fden
local.subject.for2020520304 Health psychologyen
local.subject.seo2020200203 Health education and promotionen
local.profile.affiliationtypePre-UNEen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Jan 25, 2025

Page view(s)

162
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.