Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53897
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Md Nurulen
dc.contributor.authorLobry De Bruyn, Lisaen
dc.contributor.authorLawson, Andrewen
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Brianen
dc.contributor.authorHossain, Md Sarwaren
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-11T00:54:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-11T00:54:46Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-03-
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 43(1), p. 1-19en
dc.identifier.issn1773-0155en
dc.identifier.issn1774-0746en
dc.identifier.issn1297-9643en
dc.identifier.issn0249-5627en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53897-
dc.description.abstractPrevious research on increasing soil carbon sequestration, through soil carbon management (SCM), has not integrated social components into the ecological system. To understand how experienced farmers combine social and ecological components of soil carbon management practices, we have used a social-ecological systems (SES) framework. This study examines the distribution and pattern of farmers’ SCM practices, comparing and contrasting two farming cohorts based on inherent soil fertility in a rotational grazing regime of sub-tropical temperate grazing lands in Australia. Twenty-five grazing farmers with the land of low (<i>n</i>= 13) and moderate (<i>n</i>=12) fertility soils were interviewed about SCM and how they have maintained their grazing regime despite climatic constraints using the SES framework. Both farming cohorts (low-fertility farms and moderate-fertility farms) have shown resolve to continue their grazing regime because the benefits were manifold and affected the whole-farm sustainability. Farmers with low-fertility farms highlighted a number of SCM outcomes but were less confident of achieving them. Farmers were focused on the agri-environmental benefits of SCM practices in a holistic manner, rather than a single goal of increasing soil carbon. The interviewed farmers reported a number of benefits that accrue from their grazing regimes, including improvements in production, soil moisture retention, and soil health, even though some of these benefits were not measured. Farmers in more “stressed” environments, with low soil fertility, also emphasized mental health and landscape esthetics as outcomes of SCM. These features of the farmers’ SCM provide important benefits that are not easily quantified but are also instrumental in encouraging other farmers to manage their soil. Long-term practitioners of rotational grazing such as the farmers in this study can provide useful insights for a more targeted, customized, and nuanced government policy that focuses on whole-farm sustainability, which can also improve soil carbon stocks in similar regions of Australia.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Franceen
dc.relation.ispartofAgronomy for Sustainable Developmenten
dc.titleLessons learned from farmers' experience of soil carbon management practices in grazing regimes of Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s13593-022-00863-8en
local.contributor.firstnameMd Nurulen
local.contributor.firstnameLisaen
local.contributor.firstnameAndrewen
local.contributor.firstnameBrianen
local.contributor.firstnameMd Sarwaren
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmamin9@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailllobryde@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmlawson6@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailbwilson7@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeFranceen
local.identifier.runningnumber5en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage19en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume43en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameAminen
local.contributor.lastnameLobry De Bruynen
local.contributor.lastnameLawsonen
local.contributor.lastnameWilsonen
local.contributor.lastnameHossainen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mamin9en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:llobrydeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mlawson6en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bwilson7en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0173-2863en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8509-1885en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-7983-0909en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/53897en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleLessons learned from farmers' experience of soil carbon management practices in grazing regimes of Australiaen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis research was part of a PhD project under the School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England (UNE), Australia. We would like to acknowledge the UNE International Post Graduate Award, UNE School of Environmental and Rural Science, NSW Local Land Services, Southern New England Landcare, NSW Department of Primary Industry, and anonymous reviewers. We are grateful to those farmers who participated in the interviews.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorAmin, Md Nurulen
local.search.authorLobry De Bruyn, Lisaen
local.search.authorLawson, Andrewen
local.search.authorWilson, Brianen
local.search.authorHossain, Md Sarwaren
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2023en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3fdcb073-d4a8-4c7a-9637-d60aaf78a42cen
local.subject.for2020300210 Sustainable agricultural developmenten
local.subject.for2020410604 Soil chemistry and soil carbon sequestration (excl. carbon sequestration science)en
local.subject.for2020480202 Climate change lawen
local.subject.seo2020190205 Environmental protection frameworks (incl. economic incentives)en
local.subject.seo2020190103 Social impacts of climate change and variabilityen
local.subject.seo2020180605 Soilsen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
School of Law
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.