Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53775
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSherratt, Frances Cen
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Stephen Len
dc.contributor.authorHaylock, Brian Jen
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Priyaen
dc.contributor.authorHickey, Helenen
dc.contributor.authorGamble, Carrolen
dc.contributor.authorJenkinson, Michael Den
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Bridgeten
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-07T02:57:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-07T02:57:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-
dc.identifier.citationThe Oncologist, 25(4), p. e691-e700en
dc.identifier.issn1549-490Xen
dc.identifier.issn1083-7159en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53775-
dc.description.abstract<b><i>Introduction.</i></b> Providing balanced information that emphasizes clinical equipoise (i.e., uncertainty regarding the relative merits of trial interventions) and exploring patient treatment prefer-ences can improve informed consent and trial recruitment. Within a trial comparing adjuvant radiotherapy versus active monitoring following surgical resection for an atypical meningi-oma (ROAM/EORTC-1308), we explored patterns in communica-tion and reasons why health practitioners may find it challenging to convey equipoise and explore treatment preferences.<br/> <b><i>Materials and Methods</i>.</b> Qualitative study embedded within ROAM/EORTC-1308. Data were collected on 40 patients and 18 practitioners from 13 U.K. sites, including audio recordings of 39 patients' trial consultations, 23 patient interviews, and 18 practitioner interviews. Qualitative analysis drew on argu-mentation theory.<br/> <b><i>Results</i>.</b> Practitioners acknowledged the importance of the research question that the trial aimed to answer. However, they often demonstrated a lack of equipoise in consultations, particularly with eligible patients who practitioners believed to be susceptible to side effects (e.g., cognitive impairment) or inconvenienced by radiotherapy. Practitioners elicited but rarely explored patient treatment preferences, especially if a patient expressed an initial preference for active monitoring. Concerns about coercing patients, loss of practitioner agency, and time constraints influenced communication in ways that were loaded against trial participation.<br/> <b><i>Conclusions</i>.</b> We identified several challenges that practi-tioners face in conveying equipoise and exploring patient treatment preferences in oncology, and particularly neuro-oncology, trials with distinct management pathways. The find-ings informed communication about ROAM/EORTC-1308 and will be relevant to enhancing trial communication in future oncology trials. Qualitative studies embedded within trials can address difficulties with communication, thus improving informed consent and recruitment. ROAM/EORTC-1308 RCT: ISRCTN71502099. <b><i>The Oncologist</i></b> 2020;25:e691–e700en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofThe Oncologisten
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleChallenges Conveying Clinical Equipoise and Exploring Patient Treatment Preferences in an Oncology Trial Comparing Active Monitoring with Radiotherapy (ROAM/EORTC 1308)en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0571en
dc.identifier.pmid32045067en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameFrances Cen
local.contributor.firstnameStephen Len
local.contributor.firstnameBrian Jen
local.contributor.firstnamePriyaen
local.contributor.firstnameHelenen
local.contributor.firstnameCarrolen
local.contributor.firstnameMichael Den
local.contributor.firstnameBridgeten
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emailsbrow238@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpagee691en
local.format.endpagee700en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume25en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameSherratten
local.contributor.lastnameBrownen
local.contributor.lastnameHaylocken
local.contributor.lastnameFrancisen
local.contributor.lastnameHickeyen
local.contributor.lastnameGambleen
local.contributor.lastnameJenkinsonen
local.contributor.lastnameYoungen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:sbrow238en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-6142-0995en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/53775en
local.date.onlineversion2020-02-11-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleChallenges Conveying Clinical Equipoise and Exploring Patient Treatment Preferences in an Oncology Trial Comparing Active Monitoring with Radiotherapy (ROAM/EORTC 1308)en
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (Grant Reference: 2/173/14)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSherratt, Frances Cen
local.search.authorBrown, Stephen Len
local.search.authorHaylock, Brian Jen
local.search.authorFrancis, Priyaen
local.search.authorHickey, Helenen
local.search.authorGamble, Carrolen
local.search.authorJenkinson, Michael Den
local.search.authorYoung, Bridgeten
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/85e9909f-bf5f-4b2a-9ebb-3fadfb331e7cen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000512460100001en
local.year.available2020en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/85e9909f-bf5f-4b2a-9ebb-3fadfb331e7cen
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/85e9909f-bf5f-4b2a-9ebb-3fadfb331e7cen
local.subject.for2020500101 Bioethicsen
local.subject.seo2020130301 Bioethicsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/ChallengesBrown2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version957.23 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

20
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Page view(s)

306
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons