Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52699
Title: Cladism, Monophyly and Natural Kinds
Contributor(s): Boucher, Sandy C  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2022-06-07
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.52685/cjp.22.64.3Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52699
Abstract: 

Cladism, today the dominant school of systematics in biology, includes a classification component-the view that classification ought to reflect phylogeny only, such that all and only taxa are monophyletic (i.e. consist of an ancestor and all its descendants)-and a metaphysical component- the view that all and only real groups or kinds of organisms are monophyletic. For the most part these are seen as amounting to much the same thing, but I argue they can and should be distinguished, in particular that cladists about classification need not accept the typically cladist view about real groups or kinds. Cladists about classification can and should adopt an explanatory criterion for the reality of groups or kinds, on which being monophyletic is neither necessary nor sufficient for being real or natural. Thus the line of reasoning that has rightly led to cladism becoming dominant within systematics, and the attractive line of reasoning in the philosophical literature that advocates a more liberal approach to natural kinds, are seen to be, contrary to appearances, compatible.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 22(64), p. 39-68
Publisher: Kruzak d.o.o
Place of Publication: Croatia
ISSN: 1847-6139
1333-1108
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 500204 History and philosophy of science
500309 Metaphysics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280119 Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons