Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Jamie Men
dc.contributor.authorDunstan, Debra Aen
dc.contributor.authorBartik, Warrenen
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T01:57:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-28T01:57:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-13-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, v.12, p. 1-20en
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52697-
dc.description.abstract<p>The aims of this study were to examine the effectiveness of a range of smartphone apps for managing symptoms of anxiety and depression and to assess the utility of a single-case research design for enhancing the evidence base for this mode of treatment delivery. The study was serendipitously impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which allowed for effectiveness to be additionally observed in the context of significant community distress. A pilot study was initially conducted using the <i>SuperBetter</i> app to evaluate the proposed methodology, which proved successful with the four finishing participants. In the main study, 39 participants commenced (27 females and 12 males, <i>M<sub>Age</sub></i> = 34.04 years <i>SD</i> = 12.20), with 29 finishing the intervention phase and completing post-intervention measures. At 6-month follow-up, a further three participants could not be contacted. This study used a digitally enhanced, multiple baseline across-individuals single-case research design. Participants were randomly assigned to the following apps: <i>SuperBetter</i> (<i>n</i> = 8), <i>Smiling Mind</i> (<i>n</i> = 7), <i>MoodMission</i> (<i>n</i> = 8), <i>MindShift</i> (<i>n</i> = 8), and <i>Destressify</i> (<i>n</i> = 8). Symptomatology and life functioning were measured at five different time points: pre-baseline/screening, baseline, intervention, 3-week post-intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Detailed individual perceptions and subjective ratings of the apps were also obtained from participants following the study's completion. Data were analyzed using visual inspection, time-series analysis, and methods of statistical and clinical significance. Positive results were observed for all apps. Overall, more favorable outcomes were achieved by younger participants, those concurrently undertaking psychotherapy and/or psychotropic medication, those with anxiety and mixed anxiety and depression rather than stand-alone depression, and those with a shorter history of mental illness. Outcomes were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. It was concluded that a diverse range of evidence-based therapies offered via apps can be effective in managing mental health and improving life functioning even during times of significant global unrest and, like all psychotherapies, are influenced by client features. Additionally, this single-case research design is a low-cost/high value means of assessing the effectiveness of mental health apps.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundationen
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychologyen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleSmartphone Psychological Therapy During COVID-19: A Study on the Effectiveness of Five Popular Mental Health Apps for Anxiety and Depressionen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775775en
dc.identifier.pmid35069357en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameJamie Men
local.contributor.firstnameDebra Aen
local.contributor.firstnameWarrenen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emailjmarsh30@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailddunstan@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailwbartik@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden
local.identifier.runningnumber775775en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage20en
local.identifier.scopusid85121717637en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume12en
local.title.subtitleA Study on the Effectiveness of Five Popular Mental Health Apps for Anxiety and Depressionen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameMarshallen
local.contributor.lastnameDunstanen
local.contributor.lastnameBartiken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jmarsh30en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ddunstanen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:wbartiken
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0298-7393en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-8344-3306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/52697en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleSmartphone Psychological Therapy During COVID-19en
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteAustralian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarshipen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMarshall, Jamie Men
local.search.authorDunstan, Debra Aen
local.search.authorBartik, Warrenen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/30c3c7a6-1e16-45b1-a0c3-417a770beca9en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000747686600001en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/30c3c7a6-1e16-45b1-a0c3-417a770beca9en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/30c3c7a6-1e16-45b1-a0c3-417a770beca9en
local.subject.for2020520302 Clinical psychologyen
local.subject.for2020460102 Applications in healthen
local.subject.for2020420302 Digital healthen
local.subject.seo2020200305 Mental health servicesen
local.subject.seo2020200508 Rural and remote area healthen
local.subject.seo2020220103 Mobile technologies and communicationsen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/SmartphoneMarshallDunstanBartik2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version3.48 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

10
checked on Feb 15, 2025

Page view(s)

744
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

16
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons