Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52310
Title: | Strengthening Immigration Support for Agricultural Labor Migration and Ending Modern Day "Harvest of Shame" A Comparative Study of the American and Australian Approaches |
Contributor(s): | Chen, Ying (author) |
Publication Date: | 2022-03-22 |
Open Access: | Yes |
Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52310 |
Open Access Link: | https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol45/iss1/ |
Abstract: | | Both the United States and Australia rely extensively on migrant farmworkers, specifically those without lawful working permits, to meet their labor demands. This excessive dependence sparks debate over the effectiveness of immigration policies in safeguarding access to, and the sustainability of, the agricultural workforce. It also raises human rights concerns as migrant farmworkers often face a myriad of dangers and injustices on the job. In particular, undocumented farmworkers remain largely marginalized and exploited, but they are not entitled to full rights under the law, and they are reluctant to speak up against abusive labor practices due to their immigration status and the fear of detention and deportation.
This Article aims to identify feasible immigration solutions for the United States and Australia to strengthen their short-term and long-term agricultural workforce, and to uphold migrant farmworkers' rights. Part II of the Article reveals migrant farmworkers' silent struggle and discusses the importance of agricultural labor reform. Part III and Part IV compare the two immigration systems and their respective responses to the workforce and human rights issues associated with the use of migrant farmworkers. The comparison primarily focuses on the H-2A visa program and the 2021 agricultural labor bill in the United States, as well as the temporary visa schemes and the amnesty proposal in Australia. The Article acknowledges the merits of the two immigration systems, but argues that weaknesses prevail in some aspects. The United States and Australia should look at each other's practices and re-align their immigration policies so that they both create effective immigration systems that ensure the short-term and long-term agricultural workforce, and protect migrant farmworkers' human rights. A brief conclusion re-emphasizes the importance of agricultural labor reform and highlights remaining concerns regarding the reform.
Publication Type: | Journal Article |
Source of Publication: | Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 45(1), p. 19-56 |
Publisher: | Loyola of Los Angeles Law School |
Place of Publication: | United States of America |
ISSN: | 1533-5860 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 480399 International and comparative law not elsewhere classified 480704 Migration, asylum and refugee law 300210 Sustainable agricultural development |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 230599 Work and labour market not elsewhere classified 230110 Migrant and refugee settlement services 230499 Justice and the law not elsewhere classified |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes |
HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
Publisher/associated links: | https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/all_issues.html |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Law
|
Files in This Item:
1 files
Show full item record
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.