Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52310
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yingen
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T23:06:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-24T23:06:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-22-
dc.identifier.citationLoyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 45(1), p. 19-56en
dc.identifier.issn1533-5860en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52310-
dc.description.abstract<p>Both the United States and Australia rely extensively on migrant farmworkers, specifically those without lawful working permits, to meet their labor demands. This excessive dependence sparks debate over the effectiveness of immigration policies in safeguarding access to, and the sustainability of, the agricultural workforce. It also raises human rights concerns as migrant farmworkers often face a myriad of dangers and injustices on the job. In particular, undocumented farmworkers remain largely marginalized and exploited, but they are not entitled to full rights under the law, and they are reluctant to speak up against abusive labor practices due to their immigration status and the fear of detention and deportation.</p> <p>This Article aims to identify feasible immigration solutions for the United States and Australia to strengthen their short-term and long-term agricultural workforce, and to uphold migrant farmworkers' rights. Part II of the Article reveals migrant farmworkers' silent struggle and discusses the importance of agricultural labor reform. Part III and Part IV compare the two immigration systems and their respective responses to the workforce and human rights issues associated with the use of migrant farmworkers. The comparison primarily focuses on the H-2A visa program and the 2021 agricultural labor bill in the United States, as well as the temporary visa schemes and the amnesty proposal in Australia. The Article acknowledges the merits of the two immigration systems, but argues that weaknesses prevail in some aspects. The United States and Australia should look at each other's practices and re-align their immigration policies so that they both create effective immigration systems that ensure the short-term and long-term agricultural workforce, and protect migrant farmworkers' human rights. A brief conclusion re-emphasizes the importance of agricultural labor reform and highlights remaining concerns regarding the reform.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLoyola of Los Angeles Law Schoolen
dc.relation.ispartofLoyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Reviewen
dc.titleStrengthening Immigration Support for Agricultural Labor Migration and Ending Modern Day "Harvest of Shame" A Comparative Study of the American and Australian Approachesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dcterms.accessRightsGolden
local.contributor.firstnameYingen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailychen56@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumber2en
local.format.startpage19en
local.format.endpage56en
local.url.openhttps://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol45/iss1/en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume45en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameChenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ychen56en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-3894-5742en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/52310en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleStrengthening Immigration Support for Agricultural Labor Migration and Ending Modern Day "Harvest of Shame" A Comparative Study of the American and Australian Approachesen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.relation.urlhttps://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/all_issues.htmlen
local.search.authorChen, Yingen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/8ac51a14-c704-42cd-a4e3-5514440c22f4en
local.subject.for2020480399 International and comparative law not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.for2020480704 Migration, asylum and refugee lawen
local.subject.for2020300210 Sustainable agricultural developmenten
local.subject.seo2020230599 Work and labour market not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020230110 Migrant and refugee settlement servicesen
local.subject.seo2020230499 Justice and the law not elsewhere classifieden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Law
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

774
checked on May 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.