Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52034
Title: Are market mechanisms associated with alcohol and other drug treatment outcomes?
Contributor(s): Ritter, Alison (author); van de Ven, Katinka  (author)orcid ; Vuong, Thu (author); Chalmers, Jenny (author); Dobbins, Timothy (author); Livingston, Michael (author); Berends, Lynda (author)
Publication Date: 2022-04
Early Online Version: 2021-09-02
DOI: 10.1111/add.15681
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52034
Abstract: 

Background and Aims: The configuration of alcohol and other drug treatment service systems has been influenced by the uptake of market mechanisms for treatment funding and purchasing. This study measured the impact of market mechanisms for funding and purchasing alcohol and drug treatment services on client outcomes.
Design: An observational cross-sectional study, employing multi-level analysis: episodes of care data, nested within person-level data, nested within treatment site and nested within organization.
Setting and participants: One hundred and seventy-eight alcohol and other drug treatment service sites in Australia.
Measurements: Client outcome variables were length of stay and successful treatment completion. Predictor variables were competitive tendering, number of funding contracts, recurrent funding, the ratio of episodes to staff, type of professions, years of clinical experience, staff turnover and type of provider (government; non-government). Analyses controlled for drug type, type of treatment received and client characteristics.
Findings: There were no significant associations between the procurement and contracting variables and length of stay [incidence rate ratios (IRRs) ranged between 1.01 and 1.07, all P > 0.05; Bayes factors (BF) < 0.03], and inconclusive results for treatment completion [odds ratios (ORs) ranged between 1.04 and 1.15, all P > 0.05, BF = 0.51-0.63]. Having an alcohol and other drug (AOD) work-force relative to an 'other' work-force (IRR = 0.79, P = 0.021) and lower case-loads (IRR = 0.99, P = 0.047) may be associated with longer stay in treatment. Receiving services from a government compared to non-government provider may also be associated with less treatment completion (OR = 0.34, P = 0.023, BF = 2.14).
Conclusions: There appears to be no association between client outcomes and procurement and funding contract arrangements for alcohol and drug treatment services.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: NHMRC/GNT1128100
NHMRC/GNT1136944
Source of Publication: Addiction, 117(4), p. 1105-1116
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1360-0443
0965-2140
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420305 Health and community services
420606 Social determinants of health
440214 Sociological studies of crime
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200413 Substance abuse
200202 Evaluation of health outcomes
230403 Criminal justice
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Oct 12, 2024

Page view(s)

1,184
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.