Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51913
Title: Good negotiation and land-use planning: the status of negotiation in the NSW planning profession
Contributor(s): Corken, Robert (author); McGreevy, Paul  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2016
Early Online Version: 2016-05-04
DOI: 10.1080/07293682.2016.1179655
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51913
Abstract: Planning in New South Wales is undertaken within a performance-based system that invites negotiation on planning and development matters. Therefore, negotiation is an essential skill and core activity for land-use planning professionals. The aims of this research were to reveal how planners in NSW value negotiation; to determine how aware they are of good negotiation techniques; to determine if the profession adequately prepares practitioners in this skill and to identify if planners working in private practice and local or state governments negotiate differently. Respondents agreed that negotiation is an essential activity in land-use planning and that it leads to better planning outcomes. They also shared a high level of understanding and commitment to good negotiation despite the lack of specific training in the area. However, statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences on negotiation and good planning outcomes, preparation and withholding information. Other factors such as training, seniority and having worked in government and private practice may also influence some negotiation practices.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Australian Planner, 53(3), p. 201-210
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 2150-6841
0729-3682
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 330404 Land use and environmental planning
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280108 Expanding knowledge in economics
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,022
checked on Nov 24, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.