Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSparkes, Jessicaen
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Guyen
dc.contributor.authorFleming, Peter J Sen
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T03:44:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-02T03:44:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationWildlife Research, 43(1), p. 20-26en
dc.identifier.issn1448-5494en
dc.identifier.issn1035-3712en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51888-
dc.description.abstract <p><b>Context.</b> Dogs aid hunters in many parts of Australia. Because of close proximity, transfer of zoonotic disease between hunters, hunting dogs and wildlife can, and does, occur. Knowledge about cooperative hunting between humans and domestic dogs and interactions with wildlife in Australia is limited, but is necessary to improve zoonotic-risk mitigation strategies.</p><p><b>Aims.</b> We aimed to describe the frequency and geographic distribution of hunting with dogs, and to document interactions between them and wildlife that could contribute to zoonosis transmission. </p><p><b>Methods.</b>Australian hunters were invited via web-based hunting forums, hunting supply stores and government agency communications to complete an online questionnaire about their hunting activities. </p>  <p><b>Key results.</b> Most of the 440 responding hunters resided on Australia's eastern coast. Pest animal management and recreation were their primary drivers for hunting with dogs. Most hunters used one or two dogs, and travelled ≥500 km to target feral pigs, rabbits, birds and deer. Almost a quarter of respondents (<i>N</i> = 313) had lost a dog while hunting, but most (93%, <i>N</i> = 61) were reportedly recovered within a few hours. Half the respondents indicated that they had encountered wild dogs while hunting, and reported a range of consequences from non-contact interactions through to attacks on the hunting dog or hunter. </p><p><b>Conclusions.</b> Australian hunters frequently used dogs to assist in hunts of birds and introduced mammals, particularly where access was difficult because of rough terrain or thick vegetation. Interactions between hunters and non-target animals such as wild dogs were common, providing potential pathways for the spread of diseases. Furthermore, hunting expeditions >500 km from the point of residence occurred regularly, which could facilitate translocation of important zoonotic diseases between states and the creation of disparate foci of disease spread, even into highly populated areas. </p><p><b>Implications.</b> Our improved understanding of hunting-dog use in Australia is essential to quantify the risk of disease transmission between wildlife and humans, identify transmission pathways and devise management plans to quash disease outbreaks. To promote rapid detection of exotic diseases, hunters should be encouraged to report unusual wildlife behaviour and interactions with their dogs.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofWildlife Researchen
dc.titleCooperative hunting between humans and domestic dogs in eastern and northern Australiaen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/WR15028en
dc.subject.keywordszoonosisen
dc.subject.keywordsdisease transmissionen
dc.subject.keywordssurveyen
dc.subject.keywordswild dogsen
dc.subject.keywordswildlifeen
dc.subject.keywordsEcologyen
dc.subject.keywordsZoologyen
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental Sciences & Ecologyen
dc.subject.keywordscontacten
local.contributor.firstnameJessicaen
local.contributor.firstnameGuyen
local.contributor.firstnamePeter J Sen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailjsparke4@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailgballar3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpflemin7@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage20en
local.format.endpage26en
local.identifier.scopusid84962425667en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume43en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameSparkesen
local.contributor.lastnameBallarden
local.contributor.lastnameFlemingen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jsparke4en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gballar3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pflemin7en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0287-9720en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/51888en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleCooperative hunting between humans and domestic dogs in eastern and northern Australiaen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSparkes, Jessicaen
local.search.authorBallard, Guyen
local.search.authorFleming, Peter J Sen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000373345700003en
local.year.published2016en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/6b23c18a-cd8a-47d7-91f6-050a9ca49634en
local.subject.for2020310914 Vertebrate biologyen
local.subject.for2020310399 Ecology not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2020280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciencesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.