Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51647
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorColvin, A Fen
dc.contributor.authorReeve, Ien
dc.contributor.authorPeachey, Ben
dc.contributor.authorWalkden-Brown, S Wen
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T02:13:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-20T02:13:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Production Science, 61(3), p. 237-245en
dc.identifier.issn1836-5787en
dc.identifier.issn1836-0939en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51647-
dc.description.abstract<p><b><i>Context.</i></b> The third Australian national survey on control practices for internal and external parasites of sheep, following similar surveys in 2003 and 2011.<br/><b><i>Aims.</i></b> To document current parasite control practices and attitudes, measure change and to provide a benchmark against which to assess future practices and attitudes.</br><br/><b><i>Methods.</i></b> An online survey emailed to 6460 sheep producers, with a paper version supplied on request. A follow up short survey was conducted to assess non-response bias. Analysis by region and key sheep enterprise.</br><br/><b><i>Key results.</i></b> There were 354 and 250 useable responses to the main and short surveys respectively. Mean reported rainfall of 407 mm in 2018 was 27% lower than the average for respondents and >200 mm lower than mean reported rainfall in the previous surveys. The top three methods for worm control over the past 5 years were preventative treatments (74%), preparing clean pastures by spelling paddocks (62%) and treatment on the basis of faecal worm egg count (WEC, 54%). The proportion of respondents using WEC monitoring in 2018 was 40.4%, with a mean frequency of 3.1/year, and this was unaffected by sheep class. The frequency of anthelmintic treatment for ewes and lambs and weaners was 2.1/year. Of the respondents, 36.7% had performed an anthelmintic resistance test in the previous 5 years. The most popular flystrike control methods were timing of crutching (76.4%), preventative chemical treatment (75.9%), timing of shearing (63.1%), mulesing (46.8%) and genetic selection (46.4%). Pain relief was widely used for mulesing ewes (86.6%) and wethers (90.9%). Only 17.3% used Australian Sheep Breeding Values for traits in rams. Most respondents reported 'evidence of lice' in the past 5 years (55.8%) and had treated for lice off shears (50.1%), short wool (16.6%) or long wool (6.6%), with only 26.7% having not treated at all in the period. Web-based sources of information on parasite control have become increasingly important.</br><br/><b><i>Conclusions.</i></b> Notable changes since the earlier surveys were high rates of pain relief when mulesing, an increase in the use of Australian Sheep Breeding Values for parasite-related traits, an increase in WEC monitoring since 2011 and an increased use of web-based resources.</br><br/><b><i>Implications.</i></b> Parasite control remains important for sheep producers and continues to evolve with new drugs and approaches. The surveys highlight the effectiveness of extension networks and identify where more attention is required.</br></p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Production Scienceen
dc.titleBenchmarking Australian sheep parasite control practices: a national online surveyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/AN20171en
local.contributor.firstnameA Fen
local.contributor.firstnameIen
local.contributor.firstnameBen
local.contributor.firstnameS Wen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolInstitute for Rural Futuresen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailahealey2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailireeve@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswalkden@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage237en
local.format.endpage245en
local.identifier.scopusid85096310807en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume61en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.title.subtitlea national online surveyen
local.contributor.lastnameColvinen
local.contributor.lastnameReeveen
local.contributor.lastnamePeacheyen
local.contributor.lastnameWalkden-Brownen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ahealey2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:ireeveen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swalkdenen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-7628-1262en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0638-5533en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/51647en
local.date.onlineversion2020-09-14-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBenchmarking Australian sheep parasite control practicesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteAustralian Wool Innovation Ltd (AWI) which is funded by Australian woolgrowers and the Australian Governmenten
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorColvin, A Fen
local.search.authorReeve, Ien
local.search.authorPeachey, Ben
local.search.authorWalkden-Brown, S Wen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000569363000001en
local.year.available2020en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/47028694-9a36-42ee-9e95-33211c009715en
local.subject.for2020300304 Animal protection (incl. pests and pathogens)en
local.subject.seo2020100413 Sheep for woolen
local.subject.seo2020100412 Sheep for meaten
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Oct 19, 2024

Page view(s)

1,406
checked on May 26, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on May 26, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.