Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51452
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForrest, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T23:25:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-24T23:25:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-01-
dc.identifier.citationRoczniki Filozoficzne, 68(3), p. 111-125en
dc.identifier.issn2450-002Xen
dc.identifier.issn0035-7685en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51452-
dc.description.abstract<p> Dariusz Łukasiewicz distinguishes six concepts of chance, some (C3, C5, C6) but not others (C1, C2, C4) compatible with human freedom in the robust ("libertarian") sense. In this paper, I argue in two ways that theists should reject ontological chance (C1) and rely instead on irreducible agency when considering events that are providentially not predestined by God. My arguments depend on a univocal understanding of the assertions that God is a loving agent and that, at their best, human beings are loving agents. Implicit in Łukasiewicz's paper, is the objection that this an improper anthropomorphism. I am an unashamed anthropomorphist and will defend univocity. </p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofRoczniki Filozoficzneen
dc.titleChance or Agency? A Response to "Divine Providence and Chance in the World"en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.18290/rf20683-5en
local.contributor.firstnamePeteren
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailpforrest@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placePolanden
local.format.startpage111en
local.format.endpage125en
local.identifier.scopusid85093844286en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume68en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.contributor.lastnameForresten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pforresten
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/51452en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleChance or Agency? A Response to "Divine Providence and Chance in the World"en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorForrest, Peteren
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2020-
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3726decc-24d4-49d7-a364-7b39c646c9f5en
local.subject.for2020500316 Philosophy of religionen
local.subject.seo2020280119 Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studiesen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Sep 14, 2024

Page view(s)

1,008
checked on Jun 18, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.