Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51452
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Forrest, Peter | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-24T23:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-24T23:25:43Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-10-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Roczniki Filozoficzne, 68(3), p. 111-125 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2450-002X | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0035-7685 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51452 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p> Dariusz Łukasiewicz distinguishes six concepts of chance, some (C3, C5, C6) but not others (C1, C2, C4) compatible with human freedom in the robust ("libertarian") sense. In this paper, I argue in two ways that theists should reject ontological chance (C1) and rely instead on irreducible agency when considering events that are providentially not predestined by God. My arguments depend on a univocal understanding of the assertions that God is a loving agent and that, at their best, human beings are loving agents. Implicit in Łukasiewicz's paper, is the objection that this an improper anthropomorphism. I am an unashamed anthropomorphist and will defend univocity. </p> | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Towarzystwa Naukowego Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Roczniki Filozoficzne | en |
dc.title | Chance or Agency? A Response to "Divine Providence and Chance in the World" | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18290/rf20683-5 | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Peter | en |
local.profile.school | School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences | en |
local.profile.email | pforrest@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | Poland | en |
local.format.startpage | 111 | en |
local.format.endpage | 125 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 85093844286 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 68 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 3 | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Forrest | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:pforrest | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/51452 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Chance or Agency? A Response to "Divine Providence and Chance in the World" | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Forrest, Peter | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.year.published | 2020 | - |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3726decc-24d4-49d7-a364-7b39c646c9f5 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 500316 Philosophy of religion | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 280119 Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
2
checked on Dec 7, 2024
Page view(s)
1,008
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Download(s)
2
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.