Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51445
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jacobs, Brendan | en |
dc.contributor.author | Robin, Bernard | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-24T21:38:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-24T21:38:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Animation, 11(3), p. 263-283 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1746-8485 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1746-8477 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51445 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>This article discusses the affordances of the explanatory animation creation process on the person who makes the animation, specifically, how his or her own conceptual understanding of any chosen topic is challenged, deepened, and ultimately consolidated throughout this process. Third generation activity theory was used in this study as a methodological lens to examine the explanatory animation process at various stages as both a tool and an object. Whilst educational animations have traditionally been the result of collaborations between professional animators and educators, this article documents how children can be engaged in this same process, as a means in itself, for the sake of their own learning. Our claim here is that the children's mental models, as depicted through the animation key frames, functioned as both flexible models and diagnostic tools.</p> | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications Ltd | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Animation | en |
dc.title | Animating Best Practice | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/1746847716662554 | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Brendan | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Bernard | en |
local.profile.school | School of Education | en |
local.profile.email | bjacobs7@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en |
local.format.startpage | 263 | en |
local.format.endpage | 283 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 84992563841 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 11 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 3 | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Jacobs | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Robin | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:bjacobs7 | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0002-1848-9356 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/51445 | en |
local.date.onlineversion | 2016-10-24 | - |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Animating Best Practice | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Jacobs, Brendan | en |
local.search.author | Robin, Bernard | en |
local.uneassociation | No | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.identifier.wosid | 000387168000004 | en |
local.year.available | 2016 | en |
local.year.published | 2016 | en |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ec952aef-4570-4b70-840b-9c520da34409 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 390102 Curriculum and pedagogy theory and development | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 390304 Primary education | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 160304 Teaching and instruction technologies | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 160103 Primary education | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Education |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
5
checked on Jan 18, 2025
Page view(s)
1,196
checked on May 26, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on May 26, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.