Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/42308
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBindari, Yugal Ren
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Robert Jen
dc.contributor.authorVan, Thi Thu Haoen
dc.contributor.authorHilliar, Matthewen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
dc.contributor.authorWalkden-Brown, Stephen Wen
dc.contributor.authorGerber, Priscilla Fen
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-14T04:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-14T04:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-05-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS One, 16(8), p. 1-17en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/42308-
dc.description.abstract<p>Traditional sampling methods for the study of poultry gut microbiota preclude longitudinal studies as they require euthanasia of birds for the collection of caecal and ileal contents. Some recent research has investigated alternative sampling methods to overcome this issue. The main goal of this study was to assess to what extent the microbial composition of non-invasive samples (excreta, litter and poultry dust) are representative of invasive samples (caecal and ileal contents). The microbiota of excreta, dust, litter, caecal and ileal contents (n = 110) was assessed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) detected in caecal contents, 99.7% were also detected in dust, 98.6% in litter and 100% in excreta. Of the OTUs detected in ileal contents, 99.8% were detected in dust, 99.3% in litter and 95.3% in excreta. Although the majority of the OTUs found in invasive samples were detected in non-invasive samples, the relative abundance of members of the microbial communities of these groups were different, as shown by beta diversity measures. Under the conditions of this study, correlation analysis showed that dust could be used as a proxy for ileal and caecal contents to detect the abundance of the phylum <i>Firmicutes</i>, and excreta as a proxy of caecal contents for the detection of <i>Tenericutes</i>. Similarly, litter could be used as a proxy for caecal contents to detect the abundance of <i>Firmicutes</i> and <i>Tenericutes</i>. However, none of the non-invasive samples could be used to infer the overall abundance of OTUs observed in invasive samples. In conclusion, non-invasive samples could be used to detect the presence and absence of the majority of the OTUs found in invasive samples, but could not accurately reflect the microbial community structure of invasive samples.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS Oneen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleMicrobial communities of poultry house dust, excreta and litter are partially representative of microbiota of chicken caecum and ileumen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0255633en
dc.identifier.pmid34351989en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameYugal Ren
local.contributor.firstnameRobert Jen
local.contributor.firstnameThi Thu Haoen
local.contributor.firstnameMatthewen
local.contributor.firstnameShu-Biaoen
local.contributor.firstnameStephen Wen
local.contributor.firstnamePriscilla Fen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailybindari@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmhilliar@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswalkden@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailpgerber2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumbere0255633en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage17en
local.identifier.scopusid85112645963en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume16en
local.identifier.issue8en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameBindarien
local.contributor.lastnameMooreen
local.contributor.lastnameVanen
local.contributor.lastnameHilliaren
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
local.contributor.lastnameWalkden-Brownen
local.contributor.lastnameGerberen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mhillia2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swalkdenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pgerber2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-7292-0007en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0638-5533en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8343-8299en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/42308en
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleMicrobial communities of poultry house dust, excreta and litter are partially representative of microbiota of chicken caecum and ileumen
local.relation.fundingsourcenotePoultry Hub Australia (grant 18-424) partially funded this research (PFG)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorBindari, Yugal Ren
local.search.authorMoore, Robert Jen
local.search.authorVan, Thi Thu Haoen
local.search.authorHilliar, Matthewen
local.search.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
local.search.authorWalkden-Brown, Stephen Wen
local.search.authorGerber, Priscilla Fen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/5c27dcdd-683b-4610-abad-73123a8b7b13en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000685265700054en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/5c27dcdd-683b-4610-abad-73123a8b7b13en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/5c27dcdd-683b-4610-abad-73123a8b7b13en
local.subject.for2020300304 Animal protection (incl. pests and pathogens)en
local.subject.for2020300903 Veterinary bacteriologyen
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/MicrobialBindariHilliarWuWalkdenBrownGerber2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version968.89 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,468
checked on Mar 3, 2024

Download(s)

28
checked on Mar 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons