Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/39536
Title: Consensus on a video analysis framework of descriptors and definitions by the Rugby Union Video Analysis Consensus group
Contributor(s): Hendricks, Sharief (author); Till, Kevin (author); den Hollander, Steve (author); Savage, Trevor N (author); Roberts, Simon P (author); Tierney, Gregory (author); Burger, Nicholas (author); Kerr, Hamish (author); Kemp, Simon (author); Cross, Matthew (author); Patricios, Jon (author); McKune, Andrew J (author); Bennet, Mark (author); Rock, Andy (author); Stokes, Keith A (author); Ross, Alex (author); Readhead, Clint (author); Quarrie, Kenneth L (author); Tucker, Ross (author); Jones, Ben  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020-05
Early Online Version: 2020-02-20
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101293Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/39536
Abstract: 

Using an expert consensus-based approach, a rugby union Video Analysis Consensus (RUVAC) group was formed to develop a framework for video analysis research in rugby union. The aim of the framework is to improve the consistency of video analysis work in rugby union and help enhance the overall quality of future research in the sport. To reach consensus, a systematic review and Delphi method study design was used. After a systematic search of the literature, 17 articles were used to develop the final framework that described and defined key actions and events in rugby union (rugby). Thereafter, a group of researchers and practitioners with experience and expertise in rugby video analysis formed the RUVAC group. Each member of the group examined the framework of descriptors and definitions and rated their level of agreement on a 5-point agreement Likert scale (1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: neither agree or disagree; 4: agree; 5: strongly agree). The mean rating of agreement on the five-point scale (1: strongly disagree; 5: strongly agree) was 4.6 (4.3-4.9), 4.6 (4.4-4.9), 4.7 (4.5-4.9), 4.8 (4.6-5.0) and 4.8 (4.6-5.0) for the tackle, ruck, scrum, line-out and maul, respectively. The RUVAC group recommends using this consensus as the starting framework when conducting rugby video analysis research. Which variables to use (if not all) depends on the objectives of the study. Furthermore, the intention of this consensus is to help integrate video data with other data (eg, injury surveillance).

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(10), p. 566-572
Publisher: BMJ Group
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1473-0480
0306-3674
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420799 Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 130602 Organised sports
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

60
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,108
checked on Apr 7, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Apr 7, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.