Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/39338
Title: Isolated & Combined Wearable Technology Underestimate the Total Energy Expenditure of Professional Young Rugby League Players; A Doubly Labelled Water Validation Study
Contributor(s): Costello, Nessan (author); Deighton, Kevin (author); Cummins, Cloe  (author)orcid ; Whitehead, Sarah (author); Preston, Thomas (author); Jones, Ben  (author)
Early Online Version: 2019-12-27
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003434Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/39338
Open Access Link: https://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/id/eprint/6223/Open Access Link
Abstract: 

Costello, N, Deighton, K, Cummins, C, Whitehead, S, Preston, T, and Jones, B. Isolated & combined wearable technology underestimate the total energy expenditure of professional young rugby league players; a doubly labelled water validation study. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2019—Accurately determining total energy expenditure (TEE) enables the precise manipulation of energy balance within professional collision-based sports. Therefore, this study investigated the ability of isolated or combined wearable technology to determine the TEE of professional young rugby league players across a typical preseason and in-season period. Total energy expenditure was measured via doubly labelled water, the criterion method, across a fourteen-day preseason (n = 6) and 7-day in-season (n = 7) period. Practical measures of TEE included SenseWear Pro3 Armbands in isolation and combined with metabolic power derived from microtechnology units. SenseWear Pro3 Armbands significantly under-reported preseason (5.00 [2.52] MJ·d−1; p = 0.002) and in-season (2.86 [1.15] MJ·d−1; p < 0.001) TEE, demonstrating a large and extremely large standardized mean bias, and a very large and large typical error, respectively. Combining metabolic power with SenseWear Pro3 Armbands almost certainly improved preseason (0.95 [0.15] MJ·d−1; Effect size = 0.32 ± 0.04; p < 0.001) and in-season (1.01 [0.15] MJ·d−1; ES = 0.88 ± 1.05; p < 0.001) assessment. However, SenseWear Pro3 Armbands combined with metabolic power continued to significantly under-report preseason (4.04 [2.38] MJ·d−1; p = 0.004) and in-season (2.18 [0.96] MJ·d−1; p = 0.002) expenditure, demonstrating a large and very large standardized mean bias, and a very large and large typical error, respectively. These findings demonstrate the limitations of utilizing isolated or combined wearable technology to accurately determine the TEE of professional collision-based sport athletes across different stages of the season.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, p. 1-6
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1533-4287
1064-8011
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420702 Exercise physiology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 130602 Organised sports
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

2
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,148
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.