Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31595
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dollery, B E | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-23T02:21:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-23T02:21:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Economic Analysis and Policy, v.71, p. 434-438 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0313-5926 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31595 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Compared with most other developed nations, Australian local government policymakers have traditionally relied heavily on structural reform based on compulsory council consolidation as their chief instrument of municipal reform. Western Australia (WA) launched its most recent attempt at local government reform in November 2017 with the appointment of a Local Government Review Panel to make recommendations on improving its Local Government Act 1995. The WA Government released the <i>Final Report: Recommendations for a New Local Government Act for Western Australia</i> prepared by the Panel in August 2020. The <i>Final Report</i> offers a host of recommendations for improving the Local Government Act 1995, the great majority of which represent uncontroversial improvements to the Act. However, Recommendation 8 calls for the establishment of a Local Government Commission empowered to make recommendations on municipal mergers and Recommendation 10 proposes the formation of community boards to facilitate municipal representation in large councils. This practice insight paper critically examines these two contentious recommendations in the light of extant empirical evidence. This serves to highlight the contrast between the weight of empirical evidence in the literature with the ‘evidence-free’ nature of Recommendations 8 and 10. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Australia | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Economic Analysis and Policy | en |
dc.title | A critical appraisal of the Western Australian local government review panel’s recommendations | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eap.2021.06.010 | en |
local.contributor.firstname | B E | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 140214 Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 940204 Public Services Policy Advice and Analysis | en |
local.profile.school | UNE Business School | en |
local.profile.email | bdollery@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 434 | en |
local.format.endpage | 438 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 85108414002 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 71 | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Dollery | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:bdollery | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/31595 | en |
local.date.onlineversion | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | A critical appraisal of the Western Australian local government review panel’s recommendations | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Dollery, B E | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.identifier.wosid | 000729159100003 | en |
local.year.available | 2021 | en |
local.year.published | 2021 | en |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/9fc1cf53-6721-4e0c-bfb5-46dc83b291e9 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 380114 Public economics - publicly provided goods | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 230204 Public services policy advice and analysis | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
Page view(s)
1,436
checked on Jan 21, 2024
Download(s)
2
checked on Jan 21, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.