Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31595
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDollery, B Een
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-23T02:21:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-23T02:21:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-
dc.identifier.citationEconomic Analysis and Policy, v.71, p. 434-438en
dc.identifier.issn0313-5926en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31595-
dc.description.abstractCompared with most other developed nations, Australian local government policymakers have traditionally relied heavily on structural reform based on compulsory council consolidation as their chief instrument of municipal reform. Western Australia (WA) launched its most recent attempt at local government reform in November 2017 with the appointment of a Local Government Review Panel to make recommendations on improving its Local Government Act 1995. The WA Government released the <i>Final Report: Recommendations for a New Local Government Act for Western Australia</i> prepared by the Panel in August 2020. The <i>Final Report</i> offers a host of recommendations for improving the Local Government Act 1995, the great majority of which represent uncontroversial improvements to the Act. However, Recommendation 8 calls for the establishment of a Local Government Commission empowered to make recommendations on municipal mergers and Recommendation 10 proposes the formation of community boards to facilitate municipal representation in large councils. This practice insight paper critically examines these two contentious recommendations in the light of extant empirical evidence. This serves to highlight the contrast between the weight of empirical evidence in the literature with the ‘evidence-free’ nature of Recommendations 8 and 10.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Australiaen
dc.relation.ispartofEconomic Analysis and Policyen
dc.titleA critical appraisal of the Western Australian local government review panel’s recommendationsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eap.2021.06.010en
local.contributor.firstnameB Een
local.subject.for2008140214 Public Economics- Publically Provided Goodsen
local.subject.seo2008940204 Public Services Policy Advice and Analysisen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailbdollery@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage434en
local.format.endpage438en
local.identifier.scopusid85108414002en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume71en
local.contributor.lastnameDolleryen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:bdolleryen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31595en
local.date.onlineversion2021-06-17-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleA critical appraisal of the Western Australian local government review panel’s recommendationsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorDollery, B Een
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000729159100003en
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/9fc1cf53-6721-4e0c-bfb5-46dc83b291e9en
local.subject.for2020380114 Public economics - publicly provided goodsen
local.subject.seo2020230204 Public services policy advice and analysisen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

1,436
checked on Jan 21, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on Jan 21, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.