Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHester, Susanen
dc.contributor.authorMayo, Janaen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-09T03:52:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-09T03:52:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31489-
dc.description<i>Final Report for CEBRA Project 20110801</i><br> Prepared with contributions from Lydia Ayto and Brian Garmsen
dc.description.abstract<p>International standards and guidelines for assessing the potential consequences of pest and disease incursions work well when impacts are on horticultural and agricultural industries, particularly where the potential economic impacts of a pest or disease can be estimated and/or demonstrated. Difficulties arise, however, when impacts fall largely on the environment, social amenity, human wellbeing and infrastructure - in this context international guidance is less clear on appropriate methodology. In these scenarios the potential economic impacts are more difficult to evaluate and are usually subjective since the value placed on damage will differ between stakeholders. This is the case for an increasing range of pests intercepted at the Australian border, such as certain species of snails, spiders, beetles, millipedes and invasive ants. In addition, information about the biology and behaviour of these pests is often absent, or minimal at best, making decision-making surrounding biosecurity risks of these 'non-industry' pests extremely difficult.</p> <p>Immediate action is taken to remove threats upon detection at the border, on the basis that the species is exotic and import conditions do not permit contamination of any biosecurity risk material. The potential biosecurity risks posed by these species must nevertheless be assessed, as a decision must be made on whether further action is required (i.e. does the consignment require treatment). Failure to assess the impacts of non-industry pest species in an appropriate, robust and reproducible manner may lead to: inconsistencies in pest regulation decisions; decisions resulting in damage to the Australian economy and environment; and unnecessary confusion and misunderstanding by domestic and international stakeholders. There is therefore a need for the department to be able to rapidly and consistently assess the potential impacts for pests whose impacts are largely on the non-industry sectors of the environment and economy, to support decision making and maintain Australia's favourable biosecurity status.</p> <p>This project reviewed the large number of existing frameworks and tools that have been developed to identify pests and diseases that pose a high risk of damage to natural environments. Key criteria were identified and used to assess these frameworks and tools in order to select one that could be adopted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (the department) to rapidly assess the impacts (i.e. potential consequences) of non-industry pests. One framework and associated tool were selected, tested and slightly modified to make it fit for purpose. This report describes that process.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCentre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis (CEBRA)en
dc.titleImproving the methodology for rapid consequence assessment of amenity and environmental pestsen
dc.typeReporten
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameSusanen
local.contributor.firstnameJanaen
local.profile.schoolUNE Business Schoolen
local.profile.emailshester@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryR1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeMelbourne, Australiaen
local.format.pages75en
local.url.openhttps://cebra.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/3890547/CEBRA-20110801-Final-Report-for-web-page-updated.pdfen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameHesteren
local.contributor.lastnameMayoen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:shesteren
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-6046-9984en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31489en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleImproving the methodology for rapid consequence assessment of amenity and environmental pestsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteDepartment of Agriculture, Water and the Environment; University of Melbourneen
local.output.categorydescriptionR1 Reporten
local.search.authorHester, Susanen
local.search.authorMayo, Janaen
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/2f087b2e-37b5-4ba2-a4c4-74d3465a00cben
local.subject.for2020410202 Biosecurity science and invasive species ecologyen
local.subject.seo2020190205 Environmental protection frameworks (incl. economic incentives)en
dc.notification.token8751a2d7-9a84-4547-99a3-ff0efd87c089en
Appears in Collections:Report
UNE Business School
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.