Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31206
Title: Dissent Dressing: The Colour and Fabric of Political Rage
Contributor(s): Coghlan, Jo  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2019
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.5204/mcj.1497Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31206
Abstract: What we wear signals our membership within groups, be theyorganised by gender, class, ethnicity or religion. Simultaneously our clothing signifies hierarchies and power relations that sustain dominant power structures. How we dress is an expression of our identity. For Veblen, how we dress expresses wealth and social stratification. In imitating the fashion of the wealthy, claims Simmel, we seek social equality. For Barthes, clothing is embedded with systems of meaning. For Hebdige, clothing has modalities of meaning depending on the wearer, as do clothes for gender (Davis) and for the body (Entwistle). For Maynard, "dress is a significant material practice we use to signal our cultural boundaries, social separations, continuities and, for the present purposes, political dissidences" (103). Clothing has played a central role in historical and contemporary forms of political dissent.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: M/C Journal, 22(1), p. 1-11
Publisher: Queensland University of Technology, Creative Industries Faculty
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1441-2616
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 441008 Sociology of culture
441010 Sociology of gender
441001 Applied sociology, program evaluation and social impact assessment
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280123 Expanding knowledge in human society
230204 Public services policy advice and analysis
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,414
checked on Oct 8, 2023

Download(s)

4
checked on Oct 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons