Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKolakshyapati, Men
dc.contributor.authorWu, Sen
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, T Zimazileen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Ien
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-27T06:34:31Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-27T06:34:31Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the 22nd European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, p. 173-173en
dc.identifier.isbn9788394276065en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31138-
dc.description.abstractWithin a free-range flock, some hens prefer to spend majority of their time in the shed, while others frequently access the range. Development of these sub-populations may be associated with different hen performance. Evaluation of energy efficiency of laying hens provides important knowledge for optimal egg production. The aim of this study was to determine net energy utilisation of these subpopulations obtained from a free-range system. Forty-eight Lohmann brown hens at 72weeks of age were selected from a commercial free-range farm and classified as heavy or light body weight (average 2.01kg and 1.68kg respectively, n=24) and as rangers (accessed the range on 84.1 % of the available days; n=24) or stayers (accessed tl1e range on 7.17% of available days; n=24). The energy efficiencies were evaluated in a close-circuit respiratory chamber system. Stayers had significantly higher metabolisable energy intake/bird/d/BW<sup>0.75</sup> (0.852±0.019 vs 0.798±0.016 MJ/g; P=0.025), heat production/BW<sup>0.75</sup> (0.637±0.069 vs 0.607±0.057 MJ; P=0.005), heat increment/BW<sup>0.75</sup> (0.267±0.007 vs 0.237±0.006 MJ;P=0.005) and retained nitrogen/ bird/d (1.59±0.02 vs l.46±0.03g; P=0.023) compared to rangers. Light hens had significantly higher metabolisable energy intake/bird/d/BWo75 (0.854±0.019 vs 0.796±0.016 MJ/g; P=0.018), net energy intake/bird/d/BW<sup>0.75</sup> (0.595±0.013 vs 0.551±0.012 MJ/g; P=0.032), retained energy/bird/d/BW<sup>0.75</sup>(0.225±0.013 vs 0.181±0.012 MJ; P=0.032) and lower heat production/bird/d (0.936±0.011 vs 1.003±0.012 MJ; P=0.002) than heavier hens. In conclusion, stayers required higher maintenance energy than rangers, and light rangers are more energy efficient than light stayers. Future research on determination of ideal body weight of layers in the freerange system would be beneficial.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWorld's Poultry Science Association (WPSA)en
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the 22nd European Symposium on Poultry Nutritionen
dc.titleEnergy efficiency of commercial free-range laying hens of different body weight and ranging activityen
dc.typeConference Publicationen
dc.relation.conferenceESPN 2019: 22nd European Symposium on Poultry Nutritionen
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnameMen
local.contributor.firstnameSen
local.contributor.firstnameT Zimazileen
local.contributor.firstnameIen
local.subject.for2008060603 Animal Physiology - Systemsen
local.subject.seo2008830501 Eggsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmkolaks2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailtsiband2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryE3en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.date.conference10th - 13th June, 2019en
local.conference.placeGdansk, Polanden
local.publisher.placeBeekbergen, Netherlandsen
local.format.startpage173en
local.format.endpage173en
local.url.openhttp://www.wpsa.com/index.php/publications/wpsa-proceedings/2019en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameKolakshyapatien
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mkolaks2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tsiband2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5999-0374en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0056-8419en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31138en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEnergy efficiency of commercial free-range laying hens of different body weight and ranging activityen
local.output.categorydescriptionE3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publicationen
local.conference.detailsESPN 2019: 22nd European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Gdansk, Poland, 10th - 13th June, 2019en
local.search.authorKolakshyapati, Men
local.search.authorWu, Sen
local.search.authorSibanda, T Zimazileen
local.search.authorRuhnke, Ien
local.uneassociationYesen
dc.date.presented2019-06-11-
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.conference.venueAmberExpo Exhibition and Convention Centreen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2019en
local.year.presented2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/48be3e31-e7bd-4b2a-bbb3-c8450b640a5een
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
dc.notification.token2331644b-7491-46cd-a986-ef6bd2fad986en
local.date.start2019-06-10-
local.date.end2019-06-13-
local.relation.worldcathttp://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1130784630en
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.