Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31012
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, T Zen
dc.contributor.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
dc.contributor.authorWalkden-Brown, S Wen
dc.contributor.authorde Souza Vilela, Jen
dc.contributor.authorCourtice, J Men
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Ien
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T03:42:59Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-13T03:42:59Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-29-
dc.identifier.citationArchiv für Geflügelkunde, v.84, p. 1-18en
dc.identifier.issn1612-9199en
dc.identifier.issn0003-9098en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31012-
dc.description.abstractIn order to assess the welfare and health status of commercial free-range laying hens of different body weight quantiles, a total of 7708 Lohmann Brown-classic hens at 74 weeks of age were obtained from 4 commercial free-range flocks housed on the same Australian farm under the same housing conditions. All hens were humanely killed and evaluated for body weight, feather cover, keel bone damage, gastrointestinal parasites, liver appearance, and egg follicle status. Hens were classified according to their body weight distribution percentile as light (bottom quartile, 1.65 ± 0.002 kg), medium (middle quartiles, 1.86 ± 0.010 kg), and heavy (top quartile, 2.08 ± 0.002 kg). All parameters were analysed using nominal regression models with flock, body weight, and their interactions as the predictors. In summary, 55.8% of heavy hens had a single or multiple keel bone damage compared to 48.9% and 50.7% of medium and light hens, respectively (P = 0.0001). Light hens had a significantly (P = 0.001) higher feather cover score on their breast (3.02 ± 0.018) than medium (2.96 ± 0.013) and heavy hens (2.87 ± 0.018) but significantly lower neck feather scores (P = 0.007). Light hens had the highest prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth infection (P = 0.0001), compared to the medium and heavy hens. Heavy hens had the highest incidence of Fatty Liver Syndrome compared to medium and light hens. Heavy and medium hens were significantly (P = 0.0001), more often in full egg follicle production (95.3% and 94.8%, respectively) compared to the lighter hens (90.0%). There was a significant flock effect for all parameters investigated. In conclusion, heavy (2.06 ± 0.010 kg) and medium (1.85 ± 0.010 kg) hens appeared healthier, more resilient towards infectious diseases and persistent in their egg follicle production. However, heavier hens suffered significantly more often from Fatty Liver Syndrome. Hens in the lowest quartile with mean 1.65 kg were the least economic sub-population.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherVerlag Eugen Ulmer GmbHen
dc.relation.ispartofArchiv für Geflügelkundeen
dc.titleBody weight sub-populations are associated with significant different welfare, health and egg production status in Australian commercial free-range laying hens in an aviary systemen
dc.title.alternativeBeziehung zwischen Körpergewicht und signifikanten Unterschieden im Tierwohl, Gesundheitsstatus und der Legeleistung bei kommerziellen Freilandlegehennen im Volierensystem in Australienen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1399/eps.2020.295en
local.contributor.firstnameT Zen
local.contributor.firstnameManishaen
local.contributor.firstnameS Wen
local.contributor.firstnameJen
local.contributor.firstnameJ Men
local.contributor.firstnameIen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailtsiband2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmkolaks2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswalkden@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjdesouza@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage18en
local.identifier.scopusid85079485148en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume84en
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameKolakshyapatien
local.contributor.lastnameWalkden-Brownen
local.contributor.lastnamede Souza Vilelaen
local.contributor.lastnameCourticeen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tsiband2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mkolaks2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swalkdenen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jdesouzaen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
local.booktitle.translatedEuropean Poultry Scienceen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0056-8419en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5999-0374en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0638-5533en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31012en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBody weight sub-populations are associated with significant different welfare, health and egg production status in Australian commercial free-range laying hens in an aviary systemen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis research was conducted within the Poultry CRC, established and supported under the Australian Government's Cooperative Research Centres Program. We thank the Australian Eggs for providing financial support under subproject 1UN151.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSibanda, T Zen
local.search.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
local.search.authorWalkden-Brown, S Wen
local.search.authorde Souza Vilela, Jen
local.search.authorCourtice, J Men
local.search.authorRuhnke, Ien
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000511296200001en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/dbd2c791-22c9-4505-a45b-5a0e7325747ben
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 25, 2023

Page view(s)

1,134
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.