Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30603
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Alipen
dc.contributor.authorToghyani, Mehdien
dc.contributor.authorKheravii, Sarbast Ken
dc.contributor.authorPineda, Laneen
dc.contributor.authorHan, Yanmingen
dc.contributor.authorSwick, Robert Aen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shubiaoen
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-18T23:03:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-18T23:03:22Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Nutrition, 7(2), p. 440-449en
dc.identifier.issn2405-6383en
dc.identifier.issn2405-6545en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30603-
dc.description.abstractOrganic acids (OA) and their blends have been shown to positively affect performance and health of broilers. However, the data in the literature are not consistent. This study examined the potential of blended short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) with medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters (AGP) on performance, health and welfare of broilers infected with necrotic enteritis (NE). The additives used were A) a blend of SCFA, MCFA, and a phenolic compound (SMP); B) a blend of free and buffered SCFA with MCFA (SMF); C) a blend of free and buffered SCFA with a high concentration of MCFA (SHM). A total of 1,404 Ross 308 one-day-old male parental chicks were randomly distributed into 78-floor pens with 13 replicates of 18 birds each. Six treatments were the following: T1, unchallenged control (UCC); T2, challenged control (CHC); T3, challenged group plus zinc bacitracin (BAC); T4, challenged group plus additive SMP; T5, challenged group plus additive SMF; T6, challenged group plus additive SHM. Challenged birds were gavaged with <i>Eimeria</i> spp. on d 9 and <i>Clostridium perfringens</i> EHE-NE18 on d 14. Post NE challenge and cumulatively, BWG, FCR, and nutrient digestibility of birds were compromised (<i>P</i> < 0.05) by NE challenge indicating a successful induction of sub-clinical NE. Additive SHM had higher BWG compared to CHC and BAC groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001; d 10 to 24) but not different from SMP and SMF groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). All the 3 additive groups had lower FCR compared to CHC (<i>P</i> = 0.001; d 0 to 35), and exhibited similar jejunal lesions (d 16) compared to BAC and apparent ileal protein digestibility (d 21) compared to UCC and BAC groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Birds in additive SHM group had a higher concentration of serum IgA compared to all groups (<i>P</i> = 0.001) except additive SMF (<i>P</i> > 0.05; d 21). All the additive groups had lower footpad dermatitis and hock burns compared to CHC (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The findings suggest the potential of blended OA as alternatives to BAC to protect broilers from NE indicated by improved FCR, immunity, digestibility, and bird welfare.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherZhongguo Xumu Shouyi Xuehui, Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicineen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Nutritionen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titlePotential of blended organic acids to improve performance and health of broilers infected with necrotic enteritisen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aninu.2020.11.006en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameAlipen
local.contributor.firstnameMehdien
local.contributor.firstnameSarbast Ken
local.contributor.firstnameLaneen
local.contributor.firstnameYanmingen
local.contributor.firstnameRobert Aen
local.contributor.firstnameShubiaoen
local.subject.for2008070205 Animal Protection (Pests and Pathogens)en
local.subject.seo2008830309 Poultryen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolPoultry Hub Australiaen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolPoultry Hub Australiaen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailakumar28@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmtoghya2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailsqassim2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrswick@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeChinaen
local.format.startpage440en
local.format.endpage449en
local.identifier.scopusid85105551847en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume7en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameKumaren
local.contributor.lastnameToghyanien
local.contributor.lastnameKheraviien
local.contributor.lastnamePinedaen
local.contributor.lastnameHanen
local.contributor.lastnameSwicken
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:akumar28en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mtoghya2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:sqassim2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rswicken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-8950-8841en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-3376-1677en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30603en
local.date.onlineversion2021-02-02-
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitlePotential of blended organic acids to improve performance and health of broilers infected with necrotic enteritisen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteTrouw Nutrition, a Nutreco company, The Netherlandsen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKumar, Alipen
local.search.authorToghyani, Mehdien
local.search.authorKheravii, Sarbast Ken
local.search.authorPineda, Laneen
local.search.authorHan, Yanmingen
local.search.authorSwick, Robert Aen
local.search.authorWu, Shubiaoen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000665038300019en
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ce6d69f3-beac-46f4-8197-47216e598d77en
local.subject.for2020300304 Animal protection (incl. pests and pathogens)en
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/PotentialKumarToghyaniKheraviiSwickWu2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version16.73 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Jan 18, 2025

Page view(s)

1,382
checked on Apr 2, 2023

Download(s)

12
checked on Apr 2, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons