Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEmerson, Luke Den
dc.contributor.authorBallard, Guy-Anthonyen
dc.contributor.authorVernes, Karlen
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-04T01:13:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-04T01:13:08Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-13-
dc.identifier.citationWildlife Research, 46(6), p. 518-532en
dc.identifier.issn1448-5494en
dc.identifier.issn1035-3712en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30508-
dc.description.abstract<b>Context:</b> Accurate estimates of abundance are extremely useful for wildlife management and conservation. Estimates generated from distance sampling are typically considered superior to strip transects and abundance indices, as the latter do not account for probability of detection, thereby risking significant error.<br/> <b>Aims:</b> To compare density estimates generated from conventional distance sampling (CDS) of arboreal marsupials with strip transect density estimates and abundance indices.<br/> <b>Methods:</b> Off-track CDS and strip transects were used to estimate densities of <i>P. volans</i> and <i>P. peregrinus</i> across ∼ 2.6 km<sup>2</sup> of remnant eucalypt forest at Mt Duval in north-eastern New South Wales.<br/> <b>Key Results:</b> CDS density estimates for <i>P. volans</i> (1.36 ha<sup>−1</sup>, 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.07-1.72 ha<sup>−1</sup>) and P. peregrinus (0.28 ha<sup>−1</sup>, 95% CI 0.22-0.35 ha<sup>−1</sup>) were consistent with densities reported in other studies conducted in open eucalypt forests. A strip transect width of 40m for <i>P. volans</i> resulted in a collective set of values for density (1.35 ha<sup>−1</sup>), error (s.e. ∓ 0.14), precision (cv 0.10) and 95% CI (1.07–1.62 ha<sup>−1</sup>) closest to those associated with the CDS-generated density estimate (1.36 ha<sup>−1</sup>, s.e. ∓ 0.15, cv 0.10, 95% CI 1.07–1.72 ha<sup>−1</sup>). Strip widths of 10 to 40m resulted in density estimates for <i>P. peregrinus</i> closest to those generated through CDS, but much less precise.<br/> <b>Conclusions:</b> Although a 40-m wide strip transect provided a robust density estimate for <i>P. volans</i> at Mt Duval, this is unlikely to be consistent across different study areas. Strip transects provided less precise density estimates, or underestimated <i>P. peregrinus</i> density at Mt Duval, when compared with CDS density estimates. CDS should be favoured over strip transects or abundance indices for estimating <i>P. volans</i> and <i>P. peregrinus</i> abundance, because it is capable of providing more meaningful and robust abundance estimates by accounting for the probability of detection from the transect line across different habitats.<br/> <b>Implications:</b> Researchers, conservation managers and decision makers should be aware that common methods for assessing arboreal marsupial abundance have serious potential weaknesses. Thus, it would be prudent to invest in studies that address imperfect detection to improve the quality of monitoring data.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCSIRO Publishingen
dc.relation.ispartofWildlife Researchen
dc.titleConventional distance sampling versus strip transects and abundance indices for estimating abundance of greater gliders (Petauroides volans) and eastern ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus)en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/WR18155en
local.contributor.firstnameLuke Den
local.contributor.firstnameGuy-Anthonyen
local.contributor.firstnameKarlen
local.subject.for2008060207 Population Ecologyen
local.subject.for2008060208 Terrestrial Ecologyen
local.subject.seo2008960806 Forest and Woodlands Flora, Fauna and Biodiversityen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emaillemerson@myune.edu.auen
local.profile.emailgballar3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailkvernes@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeAustraliaen
local.format.startpage518en
local.format.endpage532en
local.identifier.scopusid85072694884en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume46en
local.identifier.issue6en
local.contributor.lastnameEmersonen
local.contributor.lastnameBallarden
local.contributor.lastnameVernesen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:lemersonen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:gballar3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:kvernesen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0287-9720en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-1635-9950en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30508en
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleConventional distance sampling versus strip transects and abundance indices for estimating abundance of greater gliders (Petauroides volans) and eastern ringtail possums (Pseudocheirus peregrinus)en
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe research was conducted as part of a Bachelor of Science Honours Project and funded by the School of Environmental and Rural Science at the University of New England, Armidaleen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorEmerson, Luke Den
local.search.authorBallard, Guy-Anthonyen
local.search.authorVernes, Karlen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000489059000006en
local.year.published2019-
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/f8afab9b-620d-4361-8626-36e953aecd65en
local.subject.for2020310307 Population ecologyen
local.subject.for2020310308 Terrestrial ecologyen
local.subject.seo2020180606 Terrestrial biodiversityen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Oct 5, 2024

Page view(s)

1,160
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.