Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30247
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Andrew Gen
dc.contributor.authorJonason, Peter Ken
dc.contributor.authorBlackburn, Jesse Den
dc.contributor.authorKennair, Leif Edward Ottesenen
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Roben
dc.contributor.authorMalouff, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorStewart-Williams, Steveen
dc.contributor.authorSulikowski, Danielleen
dc.contributor.authorLi, Norman Pen
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T22:58:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-18T22:58:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Personality, 88(3), p. 606-620en
dc.identifier.issn1467-6494en
dc.identifier.issn0022-3506en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30247-
dc.description.abstract<b>Objective:</b> Mate choice involves trading‐off several preferences. Research on this process tends to examine mate preference prioritization in homogenous samples using a small number of traits and thus provide little insight into whether prioritization patterns reflect a universal human nature. This study examined whether prioritization patterns, and their accompanying sex differences, are consistent across Eastern and Western cultures.<br/><b>Method:</b> In the largest test of the mate preference priority model to date, we asked an international sample of participants (N = 2,477) to design an ideal long‐term partner by allocating mate dollars to eight traits using three budgets. Unlike previous versions of the task, we included traits known to vary in importance by culture (e.g., religiosity and chastity).<br/><b>Results:</b> Under low budget conditions, Eastern and Western participants differed in their mate dollar allocation for almost every trait (average d = 0.42), indicating that culture influences prioritization. Despite these differences, traits fundamental for the reproductive success of each sex in the ancestral environment were prioritized by both Eastern and Western participants.<br/><b>Conclusion:</b> The tendency to prioritize reproductively fundamental traits is present in both Eastern and Western cultures. The psychological mechanisms responsible for this process produce similar prioritization patterns despite cross-cultural variation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Personalityen
dc.titleMate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross‐cultural test of the mate preference priority modelen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopy.12514en
local.contributor.firstnameAndrew Gen
local.contributor.firstnamePeter Ken
local.contributor.firstnameJesse Den
local.contributor.firstnameLeif Edward Ottesenen
local.contributor.firstnameRoben
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameSteveen
local.contributor.firstnameDanielleen
local.contributor.firstnameNorman Pen
local.subject.for2008170199 Psychology not elsewhere classifieden
local.subject.seo2008970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciencesen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Psychologyen
local.profile.emailjmalouff@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.format.startpage606en
local.format.endpage620en
local.identifier.scopusid85073783430en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume88en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.title.subtitleA cross‐cultural test of the mate preference priority modelen
local.contributor.lastnameThomasen
local.contributor.lastnameJonasonen
local.contributor.lastnameBlackburnen
local.contributor.lastnameKennairen
local.contributor.lastnameLoween
local.contributor.lastnameMalouffen
local.contributor.lastnameStewart-Williamsen
local.contributor.lastnameSulikowskien
local.contributor.lastnameLien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jmalouffen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30247en
local.date.onlineversion2019-09-08-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleMate preference priorities in the East and Westen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorThomas, Andrew Gen
local.search.authorJonason, Peter Ken
local.search.authorBlackburn, Jesse Den
local.search.authorKennair, Leif Edward Ottesenen
local.search.authorLowe, Roben
local.search.authorMalouff, Johnen
local.search.authorStewart-Williams, Steveen
local.search.authorSulikowski, Danielleen
local.search.authorLi, Norman Pen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000486505800001en
local.year.available2019en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ddc475b3-a3df-4748-910e-70fe21b84aecen
local.subject.for2020520502 Gender psychologyen
local.subject.seo2020280121 Expanding knowledge in psychologyen
dc.notification.token8c7a4fe4-bb1c-4282-a92c-24f6641fcd84en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

83
checked on Dec 28, 2024

Page view(s)

1,588
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.