Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30121
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHeeringa, Wilberten
dc.contributor.authorSwarte, Femkeen
dc.contributor.authorSchüppert, Anjaen
dc.contributor.authorGooskens, Charlotteen
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-24T05:13:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-24T05:13:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationDigital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(2), p. 279-296en
dc.identifier.issn2055-768Xen
dc.identifier.issn2055-7671en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30121-
dc.description.abstractWe present two new measures of syntactic distance between languages. First, we present the 'movement measure' which measures the average number of words that has moved in sentences of one language compared to the corresponding sentences in another language. Secondly, we introduce the 'indel measure' which measures the average number of words being inserted or deleted in sentences of one language compared to the corresponding sentences in another language. The two measures were compared to the 'trigram measure' which was introduced by Nerbonne & Wiersma (2006, A Measure of Aggregate Syntactic Distance. In Nerbonne, J. and Hinrichs, E. (eds.) Linguistic Distances Workshop at the joint conference of International Committee on Computational Linguistics and the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, July, 2006, pp. 82–90.). We correlated the results of the three measures and found a low correlation between the results of the movement and indel measure, indicating that the two measures represent different kinds of linguistic variation. We found a high correlation between the results of the movement measure and the trigram measure. The results of all of the three measures suggest that English is syntactically a Scandinavian language. Because of our unique database design we were able to detect asymmetric relationships between the languages. All three measures suggest that asymmetric syntactical distances could be part of the explanation why native speakers of Dutch more easily understand German texts than native speakers of German understand Dutch texts (Swarte 2016).en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofDigital Scholarship in the Humanitiesen
dc.titleMeasuring syntactical variation in Germanic textsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/llc/fqx029en
local.contributor.firstnameWilberten
local.contributor.firstnameFemkeen
local.contributor.firstnameAnjaen
local.contributor.firstnameCharlotteen
local.subject.for2008200406 Language in Time and Space (incl. Historical Linguistics, Dialectology)en
local.subject.for2008200310 Other European Languagesen
local.subject.for2008200408 Linguistic Structures (incl. Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)en
local.subject.seo2008970120 Expanding Knowledge in Language, Communication and Cultureen
local.subject.seo2008950201 Communication Across Languages and Cultureen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciencesen
local.profile.emailcgoosken@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage279en
local.format.endpage296en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume33en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.contributor.lastnameHeeringaen
local.contributor.lastnameSwarteen
local.contributor.lastnameSchüpperten
local.contributor.lastnameGooskensen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:cgooskenen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30121en
local.date.onlineversion2017-06-19-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleMeasuring syntactical variation in Germanic textsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteNetherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (360-70-430)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorHeeringa, Wilberten
local.search.authorSwarte, Femkeen
local.search.authorSchüppert, Anjaen
local.search.authorGooskens, Charlotteen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000443559100004en
local.year.available2017en
local.year.published2018en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/183b0eef-b170-4a87-96b6-cf2dbaaef558en
local.subject.for2020470406 Historical, comparative and typological linguisticsen
local.subject.for2020470319 Other European languagesen
local.subject.for2020470409 Linguistic structures (incl. phonology, morphology and syntax)en
local.subject.seo2020280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studiesen
local.subject.seo2020280116 Expanding knowledge in language, communication and cultureen
local.subject.seo2020130201 Communication across languages and cultureen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Jul 13, 2024

Page view(s)

1,280
checked on Jun 4, 2023

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 4, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.