Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30090
Title: New ways to get policy into practice: A mixed-method participatory study of care coordination and street-level bureaucrats
Contributor(s): Nugus, Peter (author); Ranmuthugala, Geetha  (author)orcid ; Lamothe, Josianne (author); Greenfield, David (author); Travaglia, Joanne (author); Kolne, Kendall (author); Kryluk, Julia (author); Braithwaite, Jeffrey (author)
Publication Date: 2018-09-17
DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0239
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30090
Abstract: Purpose - Health service effectiveness continues to be limited by misaligned objectives between policy makers and frontline clinicians. While capturing the discretion workers inevitably exercise, the concept of “street-level bureaucracy” has tended to artificially separate policy makers and workers. The purpose of this paper is to understand the role of social-organizational context in aligning policy with practice.
Design/methodology/approach - This mixed-method participatory study focuses on a locally developed tool to implement an Australia-wide strategy to engage and respond to mental health services for parents with mental illness. Researchers: completed 69 client file audits; administered 64 staff surveys; conducted 24 interviews and focus groups (64 participants) with staff and a consumer representative; and observed eight staff meetings, in an acute and sub-acute mental health unit. Data were analyzed using content analysis, thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.
Findings - Based on successes and shortcomings of the implementation (assessment completed for only 30 percent of clients), a model of integration is presented, distinguishing “assimilist” from “externalist” positions. These depend on the degree to which, and how, the work environment affords clinicians the setting to coordinate efforts to take account of clients’ personal and social needs. This was particularly so for allied health clinicians and nurses undertaking sub-acute rehabilitative-transitional work.
Originality/value - A new conceptualization of street-level bureaucracy is offered. Rather than as disconnected, it is a process of mutual influence among interdependent actors. This positioning can serve as a framework to evaluate how and under what circumstances discretion is appropriate, and to be supported by managers and policy makers to optimize client-defined needs.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Health Organization and Management, 32(6), p. 809-824
Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1758-7247
1477-7266
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 111702 Aged Health Care
111709 Health Care Administration
111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420301 Aged health care
420306 Health care administration
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920299 Health and Support Services not elsewhere classified
920413 Social Structure and Health
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200207 Social structure and health
200413 Substance abuse
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Dec 7, 2024

Page view(s)

1,566
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.