Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30088
Title: Common mental disorders among Indigenous people living in regional, remote and metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional study
Contributor(s): Nasir, Bushra F (author); Toombs, Maree R (author); Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas (author); Kisely, Steve (author); Gill, Neeraj S (author); Black, Emma (author); Hayman, Noel (author); Ranmuthugala, Geetha  (author)orcid ; Beccaria, Gavin (author); Ostini, Remo (author); Nicholson, Geoffrey C (author)
Publication Date: 2018-06-30
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020196
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30088
Abstract: Objective To determine, using face-to-face diagnostic interviews, the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMD) in a cohort of adult Indigenous Australians, the cultural acceptability of the interviews, the rates of comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrists' diagnoses.
Design Cross-sectional study July 2014–November 2016. Psychologists conducted Structured Clinical Interviews for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) (n=544). Psychiatrists interviewed a subsample (n=78).
Setting Four Aboriginal Medical Services and the general community located in urban, regional and remote areas of Southern Queensland and two Aboriginal Reserves located in New South Wales.
Participants Indigenous Australian adults.
Outcome measures Cultural acceptability of SCID-I interviews, standardised rates of CMD, comorbid CMD and concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses.
Results Participants reported that the SCID-I interviews were generally culturally acceptable. Standardised rates (95% CI) of current mood, anxiety, substance use and any mental disorder were 16.2% (12.2% to 20.2%), 29.2% (24.2% to 34.1%), 12.4% (8.8% to 16.1%) and 42.2% (38.8% to 47.7%), respectively—6.7-fold, 3.8-fold, 6.9-fold and 4.2-fold higher, respectively, than those of the Australian population. Differences between this Indigenous cohort and the Australian population were less marked for 12-month (2.4-fold) and lifetime prevalence (1.3-fold). Comorbid mental disorder was threefold to fourfold higher. In subgroups living on traditional lands in Indigenous reserves and in remote areas, the rate was half that of those living in mainstream communities. Moderate-to-good concordance with psychiatrist diagnoses was found.
Conclusions The prevalence of current CMD in this Indigenous population is substantially higher than previous estimates. The lower relative rates of non-current disorders are consistent with underdiagnosis of previous events. The lower rates among Reserve and remote area residents point to the importance of Indigenous peoples' connection to their traditional lands and culture, and a potentially important protective factor. A larger study with random sampling is required to determine the population prevalence of CMD in Indigenous Australians.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: NHMRC/1061963
Source of Publication: BMJ Open, 8(6), p. 1-11
Publisher: BMJ Group
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 2044-6055
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 111701 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health
111714 Mental Health
111706 Epidemiology
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 450419 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social determinants of health
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920302 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health - Health Status and Outcomes
920404 Disease Distribution and Transmission (incl. Surveillance and Response)
920410 Mental Health
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 210302 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health status and outcomes
200404 Disease distribution and transmission (incl. surveillance and response)
200409 Mental health
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/CommonRanmuthugala2018JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.27 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

48
checked on Dec 7, 2024

Page view(s)

1,606
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

92
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons