Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Terence Zen
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Cuevas, Santiagoen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-27T04:15:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-27T04:15:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.citationAnimal Nutrition, 6(2), p. 192-197en
dc.identifier.issn2405-6383en
dc.identifier.issn2405-6545en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29325-
dc.description.abstractWithin a given free-range flock, some hens prefer to spend the majority of their time in the shed (stayers), while others frequently access the range (rangers). Laying performance has been associated not only with the development of these sub-populations but also with different body weights (BW). The purpose of this study was to determine if range usage, BW or a combination of both is associated with energy metabolism and as such contribute to improved hen performance. Forty-eight Lohmann Brown hens at 74 wk of age were selected from a commercial free-range farm based on their BW and range usage over a 56-week period. Using a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, hens were either classified as heavy (mean ± SEM; 2.01 ± 0.02 kg, <i>n</i> = 24) or light (1.68 ± 0.01 kg, <i>n</i> = 24), and also classified as rangers (accessed the range for 84.1% of available days, 242 ± 3.75 d; <i>n</i> = 24) or stayers (accessed the range for 7.17% of available days; 23.4 ± 6.08 d, <i>n</i> = 24). Stayers had significantly higher metabolizable energy (ME) intake per metabolic BW per d (0.852 vs. 0.798 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.025), higher heat production (0.637 vs. 0.607 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.005), higher heat increment (0.267 vs. 0.237 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.005) and retained more nitrogen (1.59 vs. 1.46 g/hen per d; <i>P</i> = 0.023) compared to the rangers. Light hens had significantly higher metabolic energy intake per metabolic BW (0.854 vs. 0.796 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.018), net energy (NE) intake (0.595 vs. 0.551 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.032), and retained energy (0.225 vs. 0.181 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.032), as well as lower heat production (0.936 vs. 1.003 MJ/hen per d; <i>P</i> = 0.002) compared to heavier hens. An interaction was observed across levels of analysis i.e. between light stayers and light rangers. The light rangers had significantly higher NE intake compared to the light stayers (9.77 vs. 9.27 MJ/kg BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d; <i>P</i> = 0.024). In conclusion, light hens were more energy efficient compared to heavy hens. Moreover, light rangers had a more efficient feed utilisation compared to the light stayers.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherZhongguo Xumu Shouyi Xuehui, Chinese Association of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicineen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimal Nutritionen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleBody weight and range usage affect net energy utilisation in commercial free-range laying hens when evaluated in net energy chambersen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aninu.2019.12.003en
dc.identifier.pmid32542200en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameManishaen
local.contributor.firstnameShu-Biaoen
local.contributor.firstnameTerence Zen
local.contributor.firstnameSantiagoen
local.contributor.firstnameIsabelleen
local.subject.for2008070204 Animal Nutritionen
local.subject.seo2008830309 Poultryen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmkolaks2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeChinaen
local.format.startpage192en
local.format.endpage197en
local.identifier.scopusid85083315503en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume6en
local.identifier.issue2en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameKolakshyapatien
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameRamirez-Cuevasen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mkolaks2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/29325en
local.date.onlineversion2020-01-29-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleBody weight and range usage affect net energy utilisation in commercial free-range laying hens when evaluated in net energy chambersen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteAustralian Eggs; Poultry Cooperative Reserach Centre (project number 1UN151)en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
local.search.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
local.search.authorSibanda, Terence Zen
local.search.authorRamirez-Cuevas, Santiagoen
local.search.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/629868ce-cef2-495f-b3b5-55e2276d7cccen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000540031800011en
local.year.available2020-
local.year.published2020-
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/629868ce-cef2-495f-b3b5-55e2276d7cccen
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/629868ce-cef2-495f-b3b5-55e2276d7cccen
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUnknownen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/BodyKolakshyapatiWuRuhnke2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version612.44 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,322
checked on Mar 10, 2024

Download(s)

160
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons