Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29090
Title: Non-Bee Insects as Visitors and Pollinators of Crops: Biology, Ecology, and Management
Contributor(s): Rader, R  (author)orcid ; Cunningham, S A (author); Howlett, B G (author); Inouye, D W (author)
Publication Date: 2020-01
Early Online Version: 2019-10-14
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025055
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29090
Abstract: Insects other than bees (i.e., non-bees) have been acknowledged as important crop pollinators, but our understanding of which crop plants they visit and how effective they are as crop pollinators is limited. To compare visitation and efficiency of crop-pollinating bees and non-bees at a global scale, we review the literature published from 1950 to 2018 concerning the visitors and pollinators of 105 global food crops that are known to benefit from animal pollinators. Of the 105 animal-pollinated crops, a significant proportion are visited by both bee and non-bee taxa (n = 82; 77%), with a total gross domestic product (GDP) value of US$780.8 billion. For crops with a narrower range of visitors, those that favor non-bees (n = 8) have a value of US$1.2 billion, compared to those that favor bees (n = 15), with a value of US$19.0 billion. Limited pollinator efficiency data were available for one or more taxa in only half of the crops (n = 61; 58%). Among the non-bees, some families were recorded visiting a wide range of crops (>12), including six families of flies (Syrphidae, Calliphoridae, Muscidae, Sarcophagidae, Tachinidae, and Bombyliidae), two beetle families (Coccinelidae and Nitidulidae), ants (Formicidae), wasps (Vespidae), and four families of moths and butterflies (Hesperiidae, Lycaenidae, Nymphalidae, and Pieridae). Among the non-bees, taxa within the dipteran families Syrphidae and Calliphoridae were the most common visitors to the most crops, but this may be an artifact of the limited data available. The diversity of species and life histories in these groups of lesser-known pollinators indicates that diet, larval requirements, and other reproductive needs will require alternative habitat management practices to bees.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: ARC/DE170101349
Source of Publication: Annual Review of Entomology, v.65, p. 391-407
Publisher: Annual Reviews
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1545-4487
0066-4170
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 060202 Community Ecology (excl. Invasive Species Ecology)
050202 Conservation and Biodiversity
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310302 Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)
410401 Conservation and biodiversity
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960804 Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180606 Terrestrial biodiversity
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

136
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,110
checked on May 5, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on May 5, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.