Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28993
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cockerill, S A | en |
dc.contributor.author | Gerber, P F | en |
dc.contributor.author | Walkden-Brown, S W | en |
dc.contributor.author | Dunlop, M W | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-05T22:54:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-05T22:54:21Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Animal Production Science, 60(12), p. 1469-1481 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-5787 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-0939 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28993 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Australian chicken meat indutstry is rapidly expanding due to the increasing consumption of chicken meat. As a result, the industry has growing issues of sourcing new bedding materials and disposing of spent litter, which can be attributed, in part, to a lack of widespread litter re-use for rearing chickens. According to insights and perspectives recently gathered from industry stakeholders, it is believed that re-using litter will become more common in the future, so as to reduce production costs and ease pressures on both the supply of new bedding materials and disposal of spent litter. However, there are potential risks that need to be addressed if litter re-use increases, particularly with regard to the production and mitigation of ammonia, which can negatively affect chicken health if not managed correctly. The present review discusses the potential benefits reported for different types of litter amendments, which have the primary goal of reducing ammonia volatilisation, but may also contribute to improvements in bird performance, welfare, pathogen loads, fertiliser value of spent litter, and reduced costs associated with purchasing new bedding materials. Acidifiers have been shown to be the most effective of all amendment types, with sodium bisulfate or alum being among the most commonly tested products mentioned in research literature. Litter amendments are currently rarely used in Australia, but it is hoped that the information provided in the present review, based mostly on overseas usage and research, will help inform future decision-making on the use of these products in Australian poultry production systems. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Animal Production Science | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Suitability of litter amendments for the Australian chicken meat industry | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1071/AN19587 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Gold | en |
local.contributor.firstname | S A | en |
local.contributor.firstname | P F | en |
local.contributor.firstname | S W | en |
local.contributor.firstname | M W | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070299 Animal Production not elsewhere classified | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 830309 Poultry | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | pgerber2@une.edu.au | en |
local.profile.email | swalkden@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 1469 | en |
local.format.endpage | 1481 | en |
local.identifier.scopusid | 85085506593 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 60 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 12 | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Cockerill | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Gerber | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Walkden-Brown | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Dunlop | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:pgerber2 | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:swalkden | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0002-8343-8299 | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0002-0638-5533 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/28993 | en |
local.date.onlineversion | 2020-05-19 | - |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Suitability of litter amendments for the Australian chicken meat industry | en |
local.relation.fundingsourcenote | AgriFutures Australia; University of New England; Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland Government | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Cockerill, S A | en |
local.search.author | Gerber, P F | en |
local.search.author | Walkden-Brown, S W | en |
local.search.author | Dunlop, M W | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.year.available | 2020 | en |
local.year.published | 2020 | en |
local.fileurl.openpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/9f397388-f3c5-498c-8dff-05efa81d2f94 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300302 Animal management | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 100411 Poultry | en |
dc.notification.token | e6050829-4246-4c61-9956-e28fa5b0a557 | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/SuitabilityGerberWalkden-Brown2020JournalArticle.pdf | Published version | 468.51 kB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
checked on Jul 20, 2024
Page view(s)
1,304
checked on Aug 4, 2024
Download(s)
110
checked on Aug 4, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License